Identification of a specific marker panel for human mesenchymal stem cell‐derived small extracellular vesicles

Abstract Human mesenchymal stem cell‐derived small extracellular vesicles (MSC‐sEVs) have demonstrated significant immunomodulatory and pro‐regenerative potentials. However, the lack of specific markers to define MSC‐sEVs presents a major challenge for their clinical application. Here, the proteomic datasets of MSC‐sEVs from three cell sources were synchronously analyzed, and several surface antigens commonly found on MSCs were selected as candidate markers due to their high abundances in MSC‐sEVs. Next, MSC‐sEVs from three cell sources (adipose tissue, umbilical cord, and induced pluripotent stem cells) were stained with fluorescein‐conjugated antibodies and analyzed by NanoFCM at single‐vesicle resolution. The positive rates of CD13, CD29, and CD90 all exceeded 60% across sEVs derived from three MSCs sources, whereas other candidates generally exhibited lower positive rates. The high positive rates of them were further verified in MSC‐sEVs purified via other methods. Moreover, high‐resolution microscopy, as an orthogonal method, visually validated their high presence in MSC‐sEVs. Meanwhile, none of the non‐MSC‐sEVs showed concurrent positive rates for CD13, CD29, and CD90 exceeding 40%, suggesting that this marker panel (with a positive rate threshold of 50% for all three markers) could specifically distinguish MSC‐sEVs from non‐MSC‐sEVs. Finally, the positive rates of this panel of markers were assessed in sEVs derived from MSCs at successive passages. The results revealed a progressive diminution of the positive rates of CD29 and CD90 in the sEVs secreted by MSCs with successive passages, accompanied by a reduction in the pro‐proliferative activity of these sEVs. Taken together, we have identified a specific and quantifiable marker panel for MSC‐sEVs characterization, which facilitates the development of standardized assays for defining MSC‐sEVs and ultimately accelerates the clinical translation of MSC‐sEVs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary medicine
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/inmd.70065
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Extracellular vesicles in disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of a specific marker panel for human mesenchymal stem cell‐derived small extracellular vesicles

Chuncui Jia, Zhengsheng Chen, Hong Yan Xu, Xin Niu et al.
1 citations
Interdisciplinary medicine
Extracellular vesicles in disease
0.81
article

Identification of a specific marker panel for human mesenchymal stem cell‐derived small extracellular vesicles

Chuncui Jia, Zhengsheng Chen, Hong Yan Xu, Xin Niu, Tao Na, Yang Wang, Haiyan Li, Qing Li, Shufang Meng, Jiashuo Liu, Lei Luo, Ji Yuan, Chao Gu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Human mesenchymal stem cell‐derived small extracellular vesicles (MSC‐sEVs) have demonstrated significant immunomodulatory and pro‐regenerative potentials. However, the lack of specific markers to define MSC‐sEVs presents a major challenge for their clinical application. Here, the proteomic datasets of MSC‐sEVs from three cell sources were synchronously analyzed, and several surface antigens commonly found on MSCs were selected as candidate markers due to their high abundances in MSC‐sEVs. Next, MSC‐sEVs from three cell sources (adipose tissue, umbilical cord, and induced pluripotent stem cells) were stained with fluorescein‐conjugated antibodies and analyzed by NanoFCM at single‐vesicle resolution. The positive rates of CD13, CD29, and CD90 all exceeded 60% across sEVs derived from three MSCs sources, whereas other candidates generally exhibited lower positive rates. The high positive rates of them were further verified in MSC‐sEVs purified via other methods. Moreover, high‐resolution microscopy, as an orthogonal method, visually validated their high presence in MSC‐sEVs. Meanwhile, none of the non‐MSC‐sEVs showed concurrent positive rates for CD13, CD29, and CD90 exceeding 40%, suggesting that this marker panel (with a positive rate threshold of 50% for all three markers) could specifically distinguish MSC‐sEVs from non‐MSC‐sEVs. Finally, the positive rates of this panel of markers were assessed in sEVs derived from MSCs at successive passages. The results revealed a progressive diminution of the positive rates of CD29 and CD90 in the sEVs secreted by MSCs with successive passages, accompanied by a reduction in the pro‐proliferative activity of these sEVs. Taken together, we have identified a specific and quantifiable marker panel for MSC‐sEVs characterization, which facilitates the development of standardized assays for defining MSC‐sEVs and ultimately accelerates the clinical translation of MSC‐sEVs.

Interdisciplinary medicineVol. 3(6)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (CN), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN), RMIT University (AU)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Extracellular vesicles in disease
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.