<scp>HBV</scp> deferrals and <scp>NAT</scp> window period: Assessing the impact of 3‐month versus 4‐month testing delays

Adopting an HBV deferral of 3 months poses a negligible incremental risk compared with 4 months and is acceptable given the resulting gain in newly eligible donors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transfusion
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18381
Primary Topic
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HBV deferrals and NAT window period: Assessing the impact of 3‐month versus 4‐month testing delays

Katy Davison, Christian Renaud, Sheila F. O’Brien, Marc Germain et al.
Transfusion
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
article

HBV deferrals and NAT window period: Assessing the impact of 3‐month versus 4‐month testing delays

Katy Davison, Christian Renaud, Sheila F. O’Brien, Marc Germain, Antoine Lewin, Hans L. Zaaijer, Sylvie Lachance
article en

Abstract

Adopting an HBV deferral of 3 months poses a negligible incremental risk compared with 4 months and is acceptable given the resulting gain in newly eligible donors.

TransfusionVol. 65(10)
Héma-Québec (CA), Animal and Plant Health Agency (GB), Sanquin (NL), Canadian Blood Services (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.