Discovery of fatigue strength models via feature engineering and automated eXplainable machine learning applied to the welded transverse stiffener

This research introduces an integrated framework that combines Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) with Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques for the prediction of fatigue strength Δ σ c in welded transverse stiffener details. The methodology synergizes expert-guided as well as algorithmic feature engineering to ensure both, high accuracy and interpretability across five model variants ( M 1 - M 5 ). An initial data curation phase was conducted to clean and harmonize an extensive fatigue test database in accordance with EN 1993-1-9 as sound base for comparative AI model assessment. Ensemble learners (e.g. LightGBM, CatBoost) achieved test RMSE ≈ 30 MPa and R Test 2 ≈ 0 . 78 over the full stress range. While M 3 attained the best training fit ( R Train 2 = 0 . 917 ), M 5 showed superior generalization, especially in the 0–150 MPa domain (RMSE ≈ 12.7 MPa, R Test 2 ≈ 0 . 58 ). SHAP interpretability consistently highlighted stress ratio R , stress range Δ σ i , yield strength R e H , and TIG dressing treatment as dominant predictors, with geometric descriptors playing secondary roles. The results suggest that M 5 offers the best balance between performance and interpretability. This work demonstrates a physically grounded, scalable method for AI-augmented fatigue assessment in structural engineering. • Unified AutoML + XAI pipeline for fatigue strength prediction of welded stiffener. • AutoML tuned tree algorithms achieve best R² values on both, training and test set. • Combining expert knowledge with algorithm-generated interactions. • Explainability built-in via SHAP values reveals dominant fatigue drivers. • Δσ , post-treatment, R , R eH are ranked highest by SHAP, affirming fatigue characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Fatigue
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109324
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discovery of fatigue strength models via feature engineering and automated eXplainable machine learning applied to the welded transverse stiffener

Helen Bartsch, Michael Anton Kraus
3 citations
International Journal of Fatigue
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
2.59
article

Discovery of fatigue strength models via feature engineering and automated eXplainable machine learning applied to the welded transverse stiffener

Helen Bartsch, Michael Anton Kraus
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This research introduces an integrated framework that combines Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) with Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques for the prediction of fatigue strength Δ σ c in welded transverse stiffener details. The methodology synergizes expert-guided as well as algorithmic feature engineering to ensure both, high accuracy and interpretability across five model variants ( M 1 - M 5 ). An initial data curation phase was conducted to clean and harmonize an extensive fatigue test database in accordance with EN 1993-1-9 as sound base for comparative AI model assessment. Ensemble learners (e.g. LightGBM, CatBoost) achieved test RMSE ≈ 30 MPa and R Test 2 ≈ 0 . 78 over the full stress range. While M 3 attained the best training fit ( R Train 2 = 0 . 917 ), M 5 showed superior generalization, especially in the 0–150 MPa domain (RMSE ≈ 12.7 MPa, R Test 2 ≈ 0 . 58 ). SHAP interpretability consistently highlighted stress ratio R , stress range Δ σ i , yield strength R e H , and TIG dressing treatment as dominant predictors, with geometric descriptors playing secondary roles. The results suggest that M 5 offers the best balance between performance and interpretability. This work demonstrates a physically grounded, scalable method for AI-augmented fatigue assessment in structural engineering. • Unified AutoML + XAI pipeline for fatigue strength prediction of welded stiffener. • AutoML tuned tree algorithms achieve best R² values on both, training and test set. • Combining expert knowledge with algorithm-generated interactions. • Explainability built-in via SHAP values reveals dominant fatigue drivers. • Δσ , post-treatment, R , R eH are ranked highest by SHAP, affirming fatigue characteristics.

International Journal of FatigueVol. 203
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discovery of fatigue strength models via feature engineering and automated eXplainable machine learning applied to the welded transverse stiffener — Helen Bartsch, Michael Anton Kraus · International Journal of Fatigue (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS