Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in diagnostic decisions: 5 questions for medical informatics and human-computer interface research
Effective AI integration requires human-centered and adaptive design. Five central research questions address: (1) what type and format of information AI should provide; (2) when information should be presented; (3) how explainable AI affects diagnostic decisions; (4) how AI influences automation bias and complacency; and (5) the risks of skill decay due to reliance on AI. Each question underscores the importance of balancing efficiency, accuracy, and clinician expertise while mitigating bias and skill degradation. AI holds promise for improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, but realizing its potential requires post-deployment evaluation, equitable access, clinician oversight, and targeted training. AI must complement, rather than replace, human expertise, ensuring safe, effective, and sustainable integration into diagnostic decision-making. Addressing these challenges proactively can maximize AI's potential across healthcare and other high-stakes domains.
Authors
- Tad T. Brunyé (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8788-8764)
- Joann G. Elmore (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7311-6835)
- Stephen R. Mitroff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-6396)
Institutions
- Tufts University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- George Washington University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Published
- 2025-08-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf123
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.27