Uncovering clinicians' inquiry-based and impression-based efforts to tailor information in oncology consultations: A focus group study

Tailoring of health-related information is recommended to address cancer patients’ diverse information needs and abilities to understand and process information. While tailored information can improve patients’ satisfaction, recall of information and emotional wellbeing, little is known about how oncology clinicians tailor information during consultations. This study examined Dutch oncology clinicians’ perceptions and experiences with tailoring of information to individual cancer patients’ information needs and cognitive abilities during clinical consultations. Focus group and dyadic interviews were conducted involving 25 clinicians (physicians and clinical nurse specialists). Results show that clinicians interpret information tailoring as a multifaceted act: it occurs in dialogue, involves clinicians and patients, and includes assessing and adjusting of information. Furthermore, two pathways to tailor information emerged: 1) tailoring based on inquiry, which refers to adjusting information based on patients' stated needs and cognitive abilities (e.g., providing requested information), and 2) tailoring based on impressions, referring to the adjusting of information based on assumptions about patient characteristics and behavior (e.g., streamlining information for emotional patients). Last, clinicians mentioned contextual and interpersonal challenges like cultural differences, language barriers, and clinical regulations. Clinicians thus use inquiry-based and impression-based approaches to provide information that is sensitive to patients’ (assumed) individual needs and abilities, interaction dynamics and the clinical setting. To ensure that information is accurately tailored, clinicians are encouraged to verify assumptions with patients and be attentive to patients’ cultural backgrounds and possible language barriers. Future research should observe how information is tailored in real clinical interactions and how patients perceive these efforts. • Information tailoring addresses patients’ diverse information needs and cognitive abilities. • Focus group and dyadic interviews with activity-oriented questions were used to uncover clinicians tailoring efforts. • Tailored provision of information knows two pathways: inquiry-based and impression-based tailoring. • Interpersonal and contextual challenges affect information tailoring. • Tailoring strategies could advance patient-centered practices in oncology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100652
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering clinicians' inquiry-based and impression-based efforts to tailor information in oncology consultations: A focus group study

Julia C.M. van Weert, Anna-Lea Van Ooijen, Inge Henselmans, Sander Dalhuisen et al.
2 citations
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
5.63
article

Uncovering clinicians' inquiry-based and impression-based efforts to tailor information in oncology consultations: A focus group study

Julia C.M. van Weert, Anna-Lea Van Ooijen, Inge Henselmans, Sander Dalhuisen, Ellen M.A. Smets, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Tailoring of health-related information is recommended to address cancer patients’ diverse information needs and abilities to understand and process information. While tailored information can improve patients’ satisfaction, recall of information and emotional wellbeing, little is known about how oncology clinicians tailor information during consultations. This study examined Dutch oncology clinicians’ perceptions and experiences with tailoring of information to individual cancer patients’ information needs and cognitive abilities during clinical consultations. Focus group and dyadic interviews were conducted involving 25 clinicians (physicians and clinical nurse specialists). Results show that clinicians interpret information tailoring as a multifaceted act: it occurs in dialogue, involves clinicians and patients, and includes assessing and adjusting of information. Furthermore, two pathways to tailor information emerged: 1) tailoring based on inquiry, which refers to adjusting information based on patients' stated needs and cognitive abilities (e.g., providing requested information), and 2) tailoring based on impressions, referring to the adjusting of information based on assumptions about patient characteristics and behavior (e.g., streamlining information for emotional patients). Last, clinicians mentioned contextual and interpersonal challenges like cultural differences, language barriers, and clinical regulations. Clinicians thus use inquiry-based and impression-based approaches to provide information that is sensitive to patients’ (assumed) individual needs and abilities, interaction dynamics and the clinical setting. To ensure that information is accurately tailored, clinicians are encouraged to verify assumptions with patients and be attentive to patients’ cultural backgrounds and possible language barriers. Future research should observe how information is tailored in real clinical interactions and how patients perceive these efforts. • Information tailoring addresses patients’ diverse information needs and cognitive abilities. • Focus group and dyadic interviews with activity-oriented questions were used to uncover clinicians tailoring efforts. • Tailored provision of information knows two pathways: inquiry-based and impression-based tailoring. • Interpersonal and contextual challenges affect information tailoring. • Tailoring strategies could advance patient-centered practices in oncology.

SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthVol. 8
Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (NL), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Cancer Center Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.