Character individuation: functional, descriptive, and developmental

Abstract Characters—parts, properties, or activities of organisms—can be individuated in multiple, non-equivalent ways. This paper aims to show how these differences matter, to frame the problem of character individuation methodologically, and to outline a path to resolving it. I describe the main scientific roles for the character concept, and analyze three broad approaches to character individuation: functional, descriptive, and developmental. I explore which approaches are appropriate for which roles, and propose two evolutionary hypotheses to explain why functionally and developmentally individuated characters diverge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2025.10180
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Values and Moral Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Character individuation: functional, descriptive, and developmental

James DiFrisco
1 citations
Philosophy of Science
Values and Moral Education
8.93
article

Character individuation: functional, descriptive, and developmental

James DiFrisco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Characters—parts, properties, or activities of organisms—can be individuated in multiple, non-equivalent ways. This paper aims to show how these differences matter, to frame the problem of character individuation methodologically, and to outline a path to resolving it. I describe the main scientific roles for the character concept, and analyze three broad approaches to character individuation: functional, descriptive, and developmental. I explore which approaches are appropriate for which roles, and propose two evolutionary hypotheses to explain why functionally and developmentally individuated characters diverge.

Philosophy of Science
The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Francis Crick Institute, Cancer Research UK, University of Cambridge, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Values and Moral Education
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.