Two Types of Natural Kind Discovery: Nobel Meets Kuhn

Abstract Philosophers have spilled much ink over the discovery of ideas in the classical “context of discovery.” However, there has been little engagement with the question of what constitutes a discovery of “things in the world.” A much-overlooked answer to this question is provided by T. S. Kuhn. In this article, I show that discoveries awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics over the past 53 years accord with a basic premise of Kuhn’s account and his distinction between two types of natural kind discoveries. I also draw normative conclusions for credit attribution in science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2025.10181
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Types of Natural Kind Discovery: Nobel Meets Kuhn

Samuel Schindler
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Two Types of Natural Kind Discovery: Nobel Meets Kuhn

Samuel Schindler
article en

Abstract

Abstract Philosophers have spilled much ink over the discovery of ideas in the classical “context of discovery.” However, there has been little engagement with the question of what constitutes a discovery of “things in the world.” A much-overlooked answer to this question is provided by T. S. Kuhn. In this article, I show that discoveries awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics over the past 53 years accord with a basic premise of Kuhn’s account and his distinction between two types of natural kind discoveries. I also draw normative conclusions for credit attribution in science.

Philosophy of Science
Aarhus University (DK)
Aarhus Universitet, University of Cambridge, University of Bristol
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.