Exploring Uncertainty in Medical Federated Learning: A Survey

The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare requires not only accurate predictions but also a clear understanding of its reliability. In safety-critical domains such as medical imaging and diagnosis, clinicians must assess the confidence in model outputs to ensure safe decision making. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) addresses this need by providing confidence estimates and identifying situations in which models may fail. Such uncertainty estimates enable risk-aware deployment, improve model robustness, and ultimately strengthen clinical trust. Although prior studies have surveyed UQ in centralized learning, a systematic review in the federated learning (FL) context is still lacking. As a privacy-preserving collaborative paradigm, FL enables institutions to jointly train models without sharing raw patient data. However, compared with centralized learning, FL introduces more complex sources of uncertainty. In addition to data uncertainty caused by noisy inputs and model uncertainty from distributed optimization, there also exists distributional uncertainty arising from client heterogeneity and personalized uncertainty associated with site-specific biases. These intertwined uncertainties complicate model reliability and highlight the urgent need for UQ strategies tailored to federated settings. This survey reviews UQ in medical FL. We categorize uncertainties unique to FL and compare them with those in centralized learning. We examine the sources of uncertainty, existing FL architectures, UQ methods, and their integration with privacy-preserving techniques, and we analyze their advantages, limitations, and trade-offs. Finally, we highlight key challenges—scalable UQ under non-IID conditions, federated OOD detection, and clinical validation—and outline future opportunities such as hybrid UQ strategies and personalization. By combining methodological advances in UQ with application perspectives, this survey provides a structured overview to inform the development of more reliable and privacy-preserving FL systems in healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14204072
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Uncertainty in Medical Federated Learning: A Survey

Xiaoyang Zeng, Muhammad Hanif Tunio, Awais Ahmed
Electronics
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Exploring Uncertainty in Medical Federated Learning: A Survey

Xiaoyang Zeng, Muhammad Hanif Tunio, Awais Ahmed
article en

Abstract

The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare requires not only accurate predictions but also a clear understanding of its reliability. In safety-critical domains such as medical imaging and diagnosis, clinicians must assess the confidence in model outputs to ensure safe decision making. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) addresses this need by providing confidence estimates and identifying situations in which models may fail. Such uncertainty estimates enable risk-aware deployment, improve model robustness, and ultimately strengthen clinical trust. Although prior studies have surveyed UQ in centralized learning, a systematic review in the federated learning (FL) context is still lacking. As a privacy-preserving collaborative paradigm, FL enables institutions to jointly train models without sharing raw patient data. However, compared with centralized learning, FL introduces more complex sources of uncertainty. In addition to data uncertainty caused by noisy inputs and model uncertainty from distributed optimization, there also exists distributional uncertainty arising from client heterogeneity and personalized uncertainty associated with site-specific biases. These intertwined uncertainties complicate model reliability and highlight the urgent need for UQ strategies tailored to federated settings. This survey reviews UQ in medical FL. We categorize uncertainties unique to FL and compare them with those in centralized learning. We examine the sources of uncertainty, existing FL architectures, UQ methods, and their integration with privacy-preserving techniques, and we analyze their advantages, limitations, and trade-offs. Finally, we highlight key challenges—scalable UQ under non-IID conditions, federated OOD detection, and clinical validation—and outline future opportunities such as hybrid UQ strategies and personalization. By combining methodological advances in UQ with application perspectives, this survey provides a structured overview to inform the development of more reliable and privacy-preserving FL systems in healthcare.

ElectronicsVol. 14(20)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), China West Normal University (CN), Shah Abdul Latif University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.