Measures of Relationship Power Dynamics in Romantic Relationships

ABSTRACT Power is central to understanding romantic relationship dynamics. Yet, the study of relationship power lacks consistent measurement or agreement on the latent construct. Valid measurement is essential to align theory and research and increase the likelihood of replicability and comparability between studies. We reviewed all power measures published in empirical articles ( k = 319) before 2022. We categorized measures into nine categories based on operationalizations, theoretical considerations, and common themes. The most commonly studied aspects of power were sexual relationship power, structural power, and general relationship power. We also summarized the study topics and sample characteristics to investigate when different types of power measures were used. We discussed how the categories of power fit into existing theories to organize and motivate future research. To establish best measurement practices, further work should test the validity of power measures, establish correlates of power, and use these findings to refine existing theories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.70019
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measures of Relationship Power Dynamics in Romantic Relationships

Brian G. Ogolsky, Yanna J. Weisberg, Jaime Derringer, Jennifer L. Hardesty et al.
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Measures of Relationship Power Dynamics in Romantic Relationships

Brian G. Ogolsky, Yanna J. Weisberg, Jaime Derringer, Jennifer L. Hardesty, Eleanor J Junkins
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Power is central to understanding romantic relationship dynamics. Yet, the study of relationship power lacks consistent measurement or agreement on the latent construct. Valid measurement is essential to align theory and research and increase the likelihood of replicability and comparability between studies. We reviewed all power measures published in empirical articles ( k = 319) before 2022. We categorized measures into nine categories based on operationalizations, theoretical considerations, and common themes. The most commonly studied aspects of power were sexual relationship power, structural power, and general relationship power. We also summarized the study topics and sample characteristics to investigate when different types of power measures were used. We discussed how the categories of power fit into existing theories to organize and motivate future research. To establish best measurement practices, further work should test the validity of power measures, establish correlates of power, and use these findings to refine existing theories.

Journal of Family Theory & ReviewVol. 18(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Linfield College (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measures of Relationship Power Dynamics in Romantic Relationships — Brian G. Ogolsky, Yanna J. Weisberg, et al. · Journal of Family Theory & Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS