A response to Swinburne’s theodicy: a simpler logical argument from evil

Abstract This is a simpler version of the argument that I presented in my debate book with. Richard Swinburne, one that also responds to Swinburne’s recent formulation of his theodicy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-025-09979-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A response to Swinburne’s theodicy: a simpler logical argument from evil

James P. Sterba
1 citations
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
17.27
article

A response to Swinburne’s theodicy: a simpler logical argument from evil

James P. Sterba
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This is a simpler version of the argument that I presented in my debate book with. Richard Swinburne, one that also responds to Swinburne’s recent formulation of his theodicy.

International Journal for Philosophy of ReligionVol. 98(3)
University of Notre Dame (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
17.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.