A Criterion for Categories on Which Every Grothendieck Topology is Rigid

Let [Formula: see text] be a small category. The subtoposes of [Formula: see text] are sometimes all of the form [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is a full subcategory of [Formula: see text]. This is the case for instance when [Formula: see text] is Cauchy-complete and finite, an Artinian poset, or the simplex category. We call such a category <i>universally rigid</i>. A universally rigid category whose slices are also universally rigid, such as the aforementioned examples, is called <i>stably universally rigid</i>. We provide two equivalent characterizations of such categories. The first one stipulates the existence of a winning strategy in a two-player game, and the second one combines two "local" properties of [Formula: see text] involving respectively the poset reflections of its slices and its endomorphism monoids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Categorical Structures
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-025-09833-z
Primary Topic
Advanced Topology and Set Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Criterion for Categories on Which Every Grothendieck Topology is Rigid

Jérémie Marquès
Applied Categorical Structures
Advanced Topology and Set Theory
article

A Criterion for Categories on Which Every Grothendieck Topology is Rigid

Jérémie Marquès
article en

Abstract

Let [Formula: see text] be a small category. The subtoposes of [Formula: see text] are sometimes all of the form [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is a full subcategory of [Formula: see text]. This is the case for instance when [Formula: see text] is Cauchy-complete and finite, an Artinian poset, or the simplex category. We call such a category <i>universally rigid</i>. A universally rigid category whose slices are also universally rigid, such as the aforementioned examples, is called <i>stably universally rigid</i>. We provide two equivalent characterizations of such categories. The first one stipulates the existence of a winning strategy in a two-player game, and the second one combines two "local" properties of [Formula: see text] involving respectively the poset reflections of its slices and its endomorphism monoids.

Applied Categorical StructuresVol. 33(6)
University of Milan (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Advanced Topology and Set Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Criterion for Categories on Which Every Grothendieck Topology is Rigid — Jérémie Marquès · Applied Categorical Structures (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS