The Impact of Face Mask Usage on Data Quality in Face-to-face Interviews

During the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face surveys changed their mode of data collection due to contact restrictions and quarantine regulations. We report the experiences from the fifth wave of our panel in Cologne, Germany ( n = 915). Data collection took place after the peak of the pandemic (summer 2022), maintaining the face-to-face mode of previous waves, with 30% of participants opting for the interviewer to wear a face mask. We find that a preference for face mask usage is not linked to the sociodemographic characteristics of participants. Interviewers reported feeling good and safe conducting face-to-face interviews despite potential infection risks. We also find no effects on item nonresponse and length of interview. And even though the open-ended responses decreased in length, their qualitative content was not affected by the face masks. These results provide a positive outlook for researchers planning to conduct face-to-face interviews in challenging times or with at-risk populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Methods
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x251348080
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Face Mask Usage on Data Quality in Face-to-face Interviews

Manuela Schmidt, Karoline R. Estermann
Field Methods
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

The Impact of Face Mask Usage on Data Quality in Face-to-face Interviews

Manuela Schmidt, Karoline R. Estermann
article en

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face surveys changed their mode of data collection due to contact restrictions and quarantine regulations. We report the experiences from the fifth wave of our panel in Cologne, Germany ( n = 915). Data collection took place after the peak of the pandemic (summer 2022), maintaining the face-to-face mode of previous waves, with 30% of participants opting for the interviewer to wear a face mask. We find that a preference for face mask usage is not linked to the sociodemographic characteristics of participants. Interviewers reported feeling good and safe conducting face-to-face interviews despite potential infection risks. We also find no effects on item nonresponse and length of interview. And even though the open-ended responses decreased in length, their qualitative content was not affected by the face masks. These results provide a positive outlook for researchers planning to conduct face-to-face interviews in challenging times or with at-risk populations.

Field MethodsVol. 38(1)
University of Bonn (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.