Gut Microbiota α- and β-Diversity, but Not Dietary Patterns, Differ Between Underweight and Normal-Weight Japanese Women Aged 20–39 Years

<b>Background and Aim:</b> Underweight young adult women are vulnerable to health risks such as menstrual disorders and vitamin deficiencies. Because few seek medical care for low body weight, the underlying causes remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the associations of body type with dietary patterns and gut microbiota diversity in young women. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled 40 women aged 20-39 years who visited a nutrition evaluation clinic with a BMI < 17.5 at their first consultation (underweight group) and 40 age-matched women with 18.5 ≤ BMI < 25 (control group). Some women in the underweight group were no longer underweight at the time of analysis but were classified based on their initial BMI. Dietary patterns were assessed based on ten major food categories (meat, fish, eggs, dairy products, soybeans, green and yellow vegetables, seaweed, fruit, tubers, and fats and oil) based on the Food Frequency Questionnaire based on Food Groups. Gut microbiota α-diversity was evaluated using the Shannon, Simpson, and Pielou indices, while β-diversity was analyzed by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and redundancy analysis (RDA). Genera contributing to group differences were identified by RDA and ANOVA-Like Differential Expression tool (ALDEx2). <b>Results:</b> Underweight women had significantly lower gut microbiota α-diversity, while no difference was observed in dietary patterns. NMDS revealed significant β-diversity differences in gut microbiota (PERMANOVA: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.064, F = 5.31, <i>p</i> = 0.0001) but not in dietary patterns (<i>p</i> = 0.99). RDA showed that body type explained 4.5% of variance (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.032, F = 3.65, <i>p</i> = 0.0005). <i>Bacteroides</i>, <i>Bifidobacterium</i>, <i>Enterocloster</i>, and <i>Erysipelatoclostridium</i> were enriched in underweight women, whereas <i>Fusicatenibacter</i>, <i>Agathobacter</i>, <i>Dorea</i>, and <i>Prevotella</i> were enriched in controls. AldEx2 confirmed increases in <i>Bacteroides</i>, <i>Enterocloster</i>, and <i>Erysipelatoclostridium</i> and a decrease in Dorea. <b>Conclusions:</b> Underweight women demonstrated reduced gut microbiota diversity and enrichment of taxa associated with inflammatory tendencies. Dietary therapies involving not only prebiotics but also probiotics may beneficially modulate gut microbiota and contribute to the management of low body weight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17203265
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gut Microbiota α- and β-Diversity, but Not Dietary Patterns, Differ Between Underweight and Normal-Weight Japanese Women Aged 20–39 Years

Hiroaki Masuyama, Chihiro Ushiroda, Kanako Deguchi, Katsumi Iizuka et al.
Nutrients
Diet and metabolism studies
article

Gut Microbiota α- and β-Diversity, but Not Dietary Patterns, Differ Between Underweight and Normal-Weight Japanese Women Aged 20–39 Years

Hiroaki Masuyama, Chihiro Ushiroda, Kanako Deguchi, Katsumi Iizuka, Kana Miyashita, Eri Hiraiwa, Masako Yamada, Risako Yamamoto-Wada, Hiroyuki Naruse
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and Aim:</b> Underweight young adult women are vulnerable to health risks such as menstrual disorders and vitamin deficiencies. Because few seek medical care for low body weight, the underlying causes remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the associations of body type with dietary patterns and gut microbiota diversity in young women. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled 40 women aged 20-39 years who visited a nutrition evaluation clinic with a BMI < 17.5 at their first consultation (underweight group) and 40 age-matched women with 18.5 ≤ BMI < 25 (control group). Some women in the underweight group were no longer underweight at the time of analysis but were classified based on their initial BMI. Dietary patterns were assessed based on ten major food categories (meat, fish, eggs, dairy products, soybeans, green and yellow vegetables, seaweed, fruit, tubers, and fats and oil) based on the Food Frequency Questionnaire based on Food Groups. Gut microbiota α-diversity was evaluated using the Shannon, Simpson, and Pielou indices, while β-diversity was analyzed by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and redundancy analysis (RDA). Genera contributing to group differences were identified by RDA and ANOVA-Like Differential Expression tool (ALDEx2). <b>Results:</b> Underweight women had significantly lower gut microbiota α-diversity, while no difference was observed in dietary patterns. NMDS revealed significant β-diversity differences in gut microbiota (PERMANOVA: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.064, F = 5.31, <i>p</i> = 0.0001) but not in dietary patterns (<i>p</i> = 0.99). RDA showed that body type explained 4.5% of variance (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.032, F = 3.65, <i>p</i> = 0.0005). <i>Bacteroides</i>, <i>Bifidobacterium</i>, <i>Enterocloster</i>, and <i>Erysipelatoclostridium</i> were enriched in underweight women, whereas <i>Fusicatenibacter</i>, <i>Agathobacter</i>, <i>Dorea</i>, and <i>Prevotella</i> were enriched in controls. AldEx2 confirmed increases in <i>Bacteroides</i>, <i>Enterocloster</i>, and <i>Erysipelatoclostridium</i> and a decrease in Dorea. <b>Conclusions:</b> Underweight women demonstrated reduced gut microbiota diversity and enrichment of taxa associated with inflammatory tendencies. Dietary therapies involving not only prebiotics but also probiotics may beneficially modulate gut microbiota and contribute to the management of low body weight.

NutrientsVol. 17(20)
Fujita Health University (JP), Fujita Health University Hospital (JP), Solutions Inc. (Japan)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Diet and metabolism studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.