Hydration and strength development of low-clinker (<50 %) factor limestone calcined clay cements (LC3): A comparative study with natural pozzolans

This study investigates the hydration kinetics and strength development of low-clinker (50–35–25 %) limestone calcined clay cements (LC 3 ) in comparison with Portland pozzolanic cements (PPC) incorporating natural pozzolans (NP). Using a combination of experimental analysis and thermodynamic modeling, the study examines phase assemblage evolution, sulfate requirements, and strength/porosity development. Results indicate that LC 3 cements exhibit enhanced hydration kinetics, increased precipitation of carboaluminates, and superior porosity reduction compared to PPC, owing to the higher reactivity and alumina content of calcined clays. This leads to a phase assemblage that yields a higher volume of solids at comparable degrees of reaction. The improved phase development enables additional clinker savings of 40–46 % while maintaining strength performance within PPC standard requirements. These findings highlight LC3 as a viable low-carbon alternative, particularly in markets where PPC is commonly used, offering significant CO₂ reduction potential while ensuring adequate mechanical performance. • Calcined clay reactivity enables additional reductions of clinker content as compared to NP. . • The higher alumina content in metakaolin yields a larger volume of hydrates than NP at equal degrees of reaction. • Replacing NP with calcined clays enables clinker reductions of up to 40–46 %. • Sulfate requirement is directly proportional to clinker factor in LC 3 formulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.144075
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydration and strength development of low-clinker (<50 %) factor limestone calcined clay cements (LC3): A comparative study with natural pozzolans

Karen Scrivener, Franco Zunino
8 citations
Construction and Building Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
7.63
article

Hydration and strength development of low-clinker (<50 %) factor limestone calcined clay cements (LC3): A comparative study with natural pozzolans

Karen Scrivener, Franco Zunino
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the hydration kinetics and strength development of low-clinker (50–35–25 %) limestone calcined clay cements (LC 3 ) in comparison with Portland pozzolanic cements (PPC) incorporating natural pozzolans (NP). Using a combination of experimental analysis and thermodynamic modeling, the study examines phase assemblage evolution, sulfate requirements, and strength/porosity development. Results indicate that LC 3 cements exhibit enhanced hydration kinetics, increased precipitation of carboaluminates, and superior porosity reduction compared to PPC, owing to the higher reactivity and alumina content of calcined clays. This leads to a phase assemblage that yields a higher volume of solids at comparable degrees of reaction. The improved phase development enables additional clinker savings of 40–46 % while maintaining strength performance within PPC standard requirements. These findings highlight LC3 as a viable low-carbon alternative, particularly in markets where PPC is commonly used, offering significant CO₂ reduction potential while ensuring adequate mechanical performance. • Calcined clay reactivity enables additional reductions of clinker content as compared to NP. . • The higher alumina content in metakaolin yields a larger volume of hydrates than NP at equal degrees of reaction. • Replacing NP with calcined clays enables clinker reductions of up to 40–46 %. • Sulfate requirement is directly proportional to clinker factor in LC 3 formulations.

Construction and Building MaterialsVol. 499
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
7.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.