Design Education of Non‐design Students and How They Perceive their Design Competency

Abstract This study investigates how non‐design majors enrolled in a first‐year industrial design foundations course at Arizona State University perceive and develop core design competencies. Positioned within a curriculum that introduces students to product design and industrial design principles, the course emphasises five competencies: synthesis, speculation, modelling, facilitation, and implementation as a scaffold for design. Through qualitative interviews with students from diverse majors, the study explores how these competencies were perceived and applied during the course. Findings indicate that students recognised the value of design in problem‐solving and innovation, particularly in managing uncertainty and fostering creativity. The study also highlights the importance of reflective practice in developing a design mindset. However, challenges remain, particularly in fostering collaborative competencies in a non‐traditional design education setting. The research suggests that enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration and integrating more practical design activities could further improve design education for non‐design students. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on the role of design education in non‐design disciplines and offer insights into improving design integration in broader educational contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Art & Design Education
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12621
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design Education of Non‐design Students and How They Perceive their Design Competency

G. Mauricio Mejía, Xueting Wu
International Journal of Art & Design Education
Design Education and Practice
article

Design Education of Non‐design Students and How They Perceive their Design Competency

G. Mauricio Mejía, Xueting Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates how non‐design majors enrolled in a first‐year industrial design foundations course at Arizona State University perceive and develop core design competencies. Positioned within a curriculum that introduces students to product design and industrial design principles, the course emphasises five competencies: synthesis, speculation, modelling, facilitation, and implementation as a scaffold for design. Through qualitative interviews with students from diverse majors, the study explores how these competencies were perceived and applied during the course. Findings indicate that students recognised the value of design in problem‐solving and innovation, particularly in managing uncertainty and fostering creativity. The study also highlights the importance of reflective practice in developing a design mindset. However, challenges remain, particularly in fostering collaborative competencies in a non‐traditional design education setting. The research suggests that enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration and integrating more practical design activities could further improve design education for non‐design students. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on the role of design education in non‐design disciplines and offer insights into improving design integration in broader educational contexts.

International Journal of Art & Design Education
Arizona State University (US)
Arizona State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.