The Social Grammar(s) of Future-Making

This article outlines a theoretical approach for studying the “grammatical” structure of processes of future-making. Building off theoretical insights about the indexicality and relationality of meaning, I show that the prevalent semantic view of future-making as a movement from imagination to action is unable to theorize the dialogical relationship between the projection of futures and the construction of corresponding trajectories. I propose an alternative that draws on the concepts of enacted sensemaking and situated action to conceptualize projection as a process of organizing indexical practices into relationally defined trajectories into the future. I then reappropriate Leifer’s analysis of how the relations between local actions constitute shared projective horizons in chess to show how this iterational fabric of interconnections defines a relational grammar that coordinates future-orientations. Finally, I use Hutchins’s analysis of distributed cognition to draw these insights together into an account of how the continuous dialogical interaction between projectivity and iteration enacts social grammars, through which images and practical trajectories of future-making are co-constructed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Theory
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751251383493
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Social Grammar(s) of Future-Making

Timo Walter
Sociological Theory
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

The Social Grammar(s) of Future-Making

Timo Walter
article en

Abstract

This article outlines a theoretical approach for studying the “grammatical” structure of processes of future-making. Building off theoretical insights about the indexicality and relationality of meaning, I show that the prevalent semantic view of future-making as a movement from imagination to action is unable to theorize the dialogical relationship between the projection of futures and the construction of corresponding trajectories. I propose an alternative that draws on the concepts of enacted sensemaking and situated action to conceptualize projection as a process of organizing indexical practices into relationally defined trajectories into the future. I then reappropriate Leifer’s analysis of how the relations between local actions constitute shared projective horizons in chess to show how this iterational fabric of interconnections defines a relational grammar that coordinates future-orientations. Finally, I use Hutchins’s analysis of distributed cognition to draw these insights together into an account of how the continuous dialogical interaction between projectivity and iteration enacts social grammars, through which images and practical trajectories of future-making are co-constructed.

Sociological TheoryVol. 43(4)
University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.