Digital Stratigraphy—A Pattern Analysis Framework Integrating Computer Forensics, Criminology, and Forensic Archaeology for Crime Scene Investigation

Background/Objectives—Traditional forensic investigations often analyze digital, physical, and criminological evidence separately, leading to fragmented timelines and reduced accuracy in reconstructing complex events. To address these gaps, this study proposes the Digital Stratigraphy Framework (DSF), inspired by archaeological stratigraphy, to integrate heterogeneous evidence into structured, temporally ordered layers. DSF aims to reduce asynchronous inconsistencies, minimize false associations, and enhance interpretability across digital, behavioral, geospatial, and excavation evidence. Methods—DSF employs Hierarchical Pattern Mining (HPM) to detect recurring behavioral patterns and Forensic Sequence Alignment (FSA) to synchronize evidence layers temporally and contextually. The framework was tested on the CSI-DS2025 dataset containing 25,000 multimodal, stratified records, including digital logs, geospatial data, criminological reports, and excavation notes. Evaluation used 10-fold cross-validation, Bayesian hyperparameter tuning, and structured train-validation-test splits. Metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and Stratigraphic Reconstruction Consistency (SRC), alongside ablation and runtime assessments. Results—DSF achieved 92.6% accuracy, 93.1% precision, 90.5% recall, 91.3% F1-score, and an SRC of 0.89, outperforming baseline models. False associations were reduced by 18%, confirming effective cross-layer alignment and computational efficiency. Conclusions—By applying stratigraphic principles to forensic analytics, DSF enables accurate, interpretable, and legally robust evidence reconstruction. The framework establishes a scalable foundation for real-time investigative applications and multi-modal evidence integration, offering significant improvements over traditional fragmented approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Sciences
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci5040048
Primary Topic
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Stratigraphy—A Pattern Analysis Framework Integrating Computer Forensics, Criminology, and Forensic Archaeology for Crime Scene Investigation

Hitesh Rawat, Anand Rajavat, Romil Rawat, Anjali Rawat et al.
Forensic Sciences
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
article

Digital Stratigraphy—A Pattern Analysis Framework Integrating Computer Forensics, Criminology, and Forensic Archaeology for Crime Scene Investigation

Hitesh Rawat, Anand Rajavat, Romil Rawat, Anjali Rawat, Mandakini Ingle, Ashish Dibouliya
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives—Traditional forensic investigations often analyze digital, physical, and criminological evidence separately, leading to fragmented timelines and reduced accuracy in reconstructing complex events. To address these gaps, this study proposes the Digital Stratigraphy Framework (DSF), inspired by archaeological stratigraphy, to integrate heterogeneous evidence into structured, temporally ordered layers. DSF aims to reduce asynchronous inconsistencies, minimize false associations, and enhance interpretability across digital, behavioral, geospatial, and excavation evidence. Methods—DSF employs Hierarchical Pattern Mining (HPM) to detect recurring behavioral patterns and Forensic Sequence Alignment (FSA) to synchronize evidence layers temporally and contextually. The framework was tested on the CSI-DS2025 dataset containing 25,000 multimodal, stratified records, including digital logs, geospatial data, criminological reports, and excavation notes. Evaluation used 10-fold cross-validation, Bayesian hyperparameter tuning, and structured train-validation-test splits. Metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and Stratigraphic Reconstruction Consistency (SRC), alongside ablation and runtime assessments. Results—DSF achieved 92.6% accuracy, 93.1% precision, 90.5% recall, 91.3% F1-score, and an SRC of 0.89, outperforming baseline models. False associations were reduced by 18%, confirming effective cross-layer alignment and computational efficiency. Conclusions—By applying stratigraphic principles to forensic analytics, DSF enables accurate, interpretable, and legally robust evidence reconstruction. The framework establishes a scalable foundation for real-time investigative applications and multi-modal evidence integration, offering significant improvements over traditional fragmented approaches.

Forensic SciencesVol. 5(4)
Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya (IN), AISECT University (IN), Medi-Caps University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.