From Technical Pitfall to Clinical Consequences: Leadless Pacing as a Rescue Solution

<b>Background and Clinical Significance:</b> Early lead failure after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation is rare but clinically significant, particularly when associated with thromboembolic complications. Technical pitfalls at the time of implantation, such as suture fixation without protective sleeves, may be predisposed to premature lead damage and abrupt device malfunction. This case highlights the role of device interrogation in diagnosing arrhythmia-related stroke, the challenges of reimplantation in the setting of venous occlusion and anticoagulation, and the value of leadless pacing as a safe rescue strategy. <b>Case Presentation:</b> A 78-year-old man with a history of complete atrioventricular block underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation one year earlier. He presented to the emergency department with acute aphasia, right-sided hemiparesis, and facial asymmetry. Stroke was diagnosed, and new-onset atrial fibrillation was documented. Device interrogation revealed an abrupt fall in lead impedance followed by a sharp rise consistent with lead insulation failure and premature battery depletion. Fluoroscopy demonstrated multiple focal narrowings of the leads and complete left subclavian vein occlusion, making conventional transvenous reimplantation unfeasible, while extraction was judged high risk. Right-sided reimplantation was avoided due to hemorrhagic risk under anticoagulation. A leadless pacemaker was implanted successfully in the apico-septal region of the right ventricle via ultrasound-guided femoral access. Hemostasis was secured with a figure-of-8 suture fixed inside a 3-way tap, providing constant compression and preventing hematoma. At two-months follow-up, device function was stable and neurological recovery was favorable (mRS = 2). <b>Conclusions:</b> This case underscores how multiple adverse factors-stroke, arrhythmia detection, early device failure, venous occlusion, and anticoagulation-may converge in a single patient, and demonstrates leadless pacing as a safe and effective rescue strategy in such complex scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reports — Medical Cases Images and Videos
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8040206
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Technical Pitfall to Clinical Consequences: Leadless Pacing as a Rescue Solution

Flavia Casolaro, Ciro Mauro, Salvatore Crispo, Fulvio Cacciapuoti et al.
Reports — Medical Cases Images and Videos
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

From Technical Pitfall to Clinical Consequences: Leadless Pacing as a Rescue Solution

Flavia Casolaro, Ciro Mauro, Salvatore Crispo, Fulvio Cacciapuoti, Mario Volpicelli, Antonio Torsi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and Clinical Significance:</b> Early lead failure after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation is rare but clinically significant, particularly when associated with thromboembolic complications. Technical pitfalls at the time of implantation, such as suture fixation without protective sleeves, may be predisposed to premature lead damage and abrupt device malfunction. This case highlights the role of device interrogation in diagnosing arrhythmia-related stroke, the challenges of reimplantation in the setting of venous occlusion and anticoagulation, and the value of leadless pacing as a safe rescue strategy. <b>Case Presentation:</b> A 78-year-old man with a history of complete atrioventricular block underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation one year earlier. He presented to the emergency department with acute aphasia, right-sided hemiparesis, and facial asymmetry. Stroke was diagnosed, and new-onset atrial fibrillation was documented. Device interrogation revealed an abrupt fall in lead impedance followed by a sharp rise consistent with lead insulation failure and premature battery depletion. Fluoroscopy demonstrated multiple focal narrowings of the leads and complete left subclavian vein occlusion, making conventional transvenous reimplantation unfeasible, while extraction was judged high risk. Right-sided reimplantation was avoided due to hemorrhagic risk under anticoagulation. A leadless pacemaker was implanted successfully in the apico-septal region of the right ventricle via ultrasound-guided femoral access. Hemostasis was secured with a figure-of-8 suture fixed inside a 3-way tap, providing constant compression and preventing hematoma. At two-months follow-up, device function was stable and neurological recovery was favorable (mRS = 2). <b>Conclusions:</b> This case underscores how multiple adverse factors-stroke, arrhythmia detection, early device failure, venous occlusion, and anticoagulation-may converge in a single patient, and demonstrates leadless pacing as a safe and effective rescue strategy in such complex scenarios.

Reports — Medical Cases Images and VideosVol. 8(4)
Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (IT), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.