Jean-Baptiste Gonet (1616ca.–1681): The First Four-Dimensionalist Philosopher

Abstract Jean-Baptiste Gonet, O.P. (c. 1616–1681), articulated a distinctly eternalist philosophical framework in his Clypeus Theologiae , wherein he maintained that God’s eternity encompasses past, present, and future entities in a mode of real coexistence. According to Gonet, divine eternity serves as the ontological measure of all things, and God apprehends past and future entities in their actual reality rather than merely as intentional objects, a position that diverges from earlier philosophical interpretations. Gonet sought to reconcile this eternalist perspective with the doctrines of creation in time and human free will. He did so by introducing a nuanced distinction in the interpretation of the verb “coexists” within the proposition “past/future entity x coexists with God.” When the verb is understood in relation to temporal reality, x is conceived as non-existent; however, when interpreted in reference to divine eternity, x is understood to possess real existence ( in re ), rather than existing solely as a conceptual entity within the divine intellect. Gonet’s system represents a rare and sophisticated attempt to integrate a Christian metaphysical framework with an eternalist ontology. This paper will examine the core arguments developed by the French Dominican, analyzing their implications within both theological and philosophical discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metaphysica
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2025-0013
Primary Topic
Historical and Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jean-Baptiste Gonet (1616ca.–1681): The First Four-Dimensionalist Philosopher

Luca Gili, Alessandro Boco
Metaphysica
Historical and Literary Studies
article

Jean-Baptiste Gonet (1616ca.–1681): The First Four-Dimensionalist Philosopher

Luca Gili, Alessandro Boco
article en

Abstract

Abstract Jean-Baptiste Gonet, O.P. (c. 1616–1681), articulated a distinctly eternalist philosophical framework in his Clypeus Theologiae , wherein he maintained that God’s eternity encompasses past, present, and future entities in a mode of real coexistence. According to Gonet, divine eternity serves as the ontological measure of all things, and God apprehends past and future entities in their actual reality rather than merely as intentional objects, a position that diverges from earlier philosophical interpretations. Gonet sought to reconcile this eternalist perspective with the doctrines of creation in time and human free will. He did so by introducing a nuanced distinction in the interpretation of the verb “coexists” within the proposition “past/future entity x coexists with God.” When the verb is understood in relation to temporal reality, x is conceived as non-existent; however, when interpreted in reference to divine eternity, x is understood to possess real existence ( in re ), rather than existing solely as a conceptual entity within the divine intellect. Gonet’s system represents a rare and sophisticated attempt to integrate a Christian metaphysical framework with an eternalist ontology. This paper will examine the core arguments developed by the French Dominican, analyzing their implications within both theological and philosophical discourse.

Metaphysica
Vilnius University (LT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), Vilnius University of Applied Sciences (LT), Azienda USL di Pescara (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Historical and Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.