The Emotional Intelligence Gap: Can AI Truly Replace Human Interaction in Library Services?

As libraries rapidly adopt artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline operations and enhance user experiences, the debate over whether AI can replace human librarians, particularly in delivering emotionally intelligent service, has intensified.This paper employs secondary research to investigate the implications of AI integration into library services, focusing on the unique human capacities that define librarian-user interactions.While AI offers unparalleled efficiency through automation, personalised search tools, and predictive analytics, it lacks core emotional intelligence competencies such as empathy, moral reasoning, and nuanced communication.Drawing from literature and conceptual analysis, the paper identifies the "emotional intelligence gap" as a central challenge to fully automating library services.explores the irreplaceable value of modern libraries.Findings revealed that although AI significantly enhances operational speed and user convenience, it falls short in areas requiring emotional labour, ethical discretion, and culturally sensitive engagement.The inability of AI to exhibit human empathy limits its effectiveness in serving vulnerable populations, resolving interpersonal conflicts, and fostering inclusive library environments.The study recommends a hybrid model where AI is leveraged to handle repetitive and data-driven tasks, while human librarians focus on relational and ethical aspects of service.Libraries should prioritise training programs that enhance librarians' emotional intelligence alongside AI literacy to promote complementary collaboration.Ultimately, emotionally intelligent human librarians remain indispensable for maintaining ethical standards, trust-based interactions, and adaptive service in the AI-augmented library ecosystem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Resource Management (JIRM)
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61955/ekyqfy
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Emotional Intelligence Gap: Can AI Truly Replace Human Interaction in Library Services?

Samuel Samuel
1 citations
Journal of Information Resource Management (JIRM)
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
article

The Emotional Intelligence Gap: Can AI Truly Replace Human Interaction in Library Services?

Samuel Samuel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As libraries rapidly adopt artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline operations and enhance user experiences, the debate over whether AI can replace human librarians, particularly in delivering emotionally intelligent service, has intensified.This paper employs secondary research to investigate the implications of AI integration into library services, focusing on the unique human capacities that define librarian-user interactions.While AI offers unparalleled efficiency through automation, personalised search tools, and predictive analytics, it lacks core emotional intelligence competencies such as empathy, moral reasoning, and nuanced communication.Drawing from literature and conceptual analysis, the paper identifies the "emotional intelligence gap" as a central challenge to fully automating library services.explores the irreplaceable value of modern libraries.Findings revealed that although AI significantly enhances operational speed and user convenience, it falls short in areas requiring emotional labour, ethical discretion, and culturally sensitive engagement.The inability of AI to exhibit human empathy limits its effectiveness in serving vulnerable populations, resolving interpersonal conflicts, and fostering inclusive library environments.The study recommends a hybrid model where AI is leveraged to handle repetitive and data-driven tasks, while human librarians focus on relational and ethical aspects of service.Libraries should prioritise training programs that enhance librarians' emotional intelligence alongside AI literacy to promote complementary collaboration.Ultimately, emotionally intelligent human librarians remain indispensable for maintaining ethical standards, trust-based interactions, and adaptive service in the AI-augmented library ecosystem.

Journal of Information Resource Management (JIRM)
African Library and Information Associations and Institutions (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.