Perceived Barriers to NGS-Based Molecular Profiling Among US Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular profiling has revolutionized personalized medicine and unlocked new treatment options for cancer patients. Clinical guideline bodies agree that patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) may benefit from comprehensive somatic genomic profiling to identify candidates for established targeted therapies and clinical trials, yet many patients are not receiving it due to a lack of widespread access to NGS. <b>Methods</b>: To better understand the perceived barriers (if any) to NGS tests in mBC, a study was conducted across multiple stakeholders including medical oncologists, nurses, physician assistants, lab directors, pathologists, payers, and patients. <b>Results</b>: This study revealed that despite the awareness and recognition of the value proposition of NGS-based molecular profiling in mBC, inconsistent payer coverage, high out of pocket costs for patients, and challenges in managing reimbursement and prior authorization processes can lead to suboptimal utilization of NGS, which can subsequently lead to suboptimal treatment decisions where approved therapies exist. Interestingly, many payers (33%) were not aware of the current somatic biomarker testing recommendations from NCCN guidelines. As a result, payers identified the lack of clear clinical guidelines (74% ranked as top 3), the lack of internal consensus on which NGS tests to cover (45%), and the absence of internal expertise on NGS (39%) as the primary hurdles for broader NGS access. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results suggest that widespread HCP and payer education on clinical guidelines (e.g., NCCN) and utility for targeted therapy selection is crucial for enhanced adoption of NGS-based molecular profiling in mBC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15202626
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived Barriers to NGS-Based Molecular Profiling Among US Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Olivia Foroughi, Gary George Gustavsen, Moumita Chaki, Stella Redpath et al.
Diagnostics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Perceived Barriers to NGS-Based Molecular Profiling Among US Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Olivia Foroughi, Gary George Gustavsen, Moumita Chaki, Stella Redpath, Omar Perez, Nicholas Cadirov
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular profiling has revolutionized personalized medicine and unlocked new treatment options for cancer patients. Clinical guideline bodies agree that patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) may benefit from comprehensive somatic genomic profiling to identify candidates for established targeted therapies and clinical trials, yet many patients are not receiving it due to a lack of widespread access to NGS. <b>Methods</b>: To better understand the perceived barriers (if any) to NGS tests in mBC, a study was conducted across multiple stakeholders including medical oncologists, nurses, physician assistants, lab directors, pathologists, payers, and patients. <b>Results</b>: This study revealed that despite the awareness and recognition of the value proposition of NGS-based molecular profiling in mBC, inconsistent payer coverage, high out of pocket costs for patients, and challenges in managing reimbursement and prior authorization processes can lead to suboptimal utilization of NGS, which can subsequently lead to suboptimal treatment decisions where approved therapies exist. Interestingly, many payers (33%) were not aware of the current somatic biomarker testing recommendations from NCCN guidelines. As a result, payers identified the lack of clear clinical guidelines (74% ranked as top 3), the lack of internal consensus on which NGS tests to cover (45%), and the absence of internal expertise on NGS (39%) as the primary hurdles for broader NGS access. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results suggest that widespread HCP and payer education on clinical guidelines (e.g., NCCN) and utility for targeted therapy selection is crucial for enhanced adoption of NGS-based molecular profiling in mBC.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(20)
Health Advances (United States) (US), AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, AstraZeneca
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.