A double hierarchy fuzzy decision approach for solar farm ranking sites in India

Solar is seen as a potential clean energy solution as world leaders shift energy sources to meet sustainability goals and country demand. Site selection for solar farms is a crucial and complex decision problem involving multiple attributes. Previous studies on site selection (i) could not model natural language preferences; (ii) did not effectively capture expert hesitation; (iii) were prone to the subjective biases of experts; (iv) involved indeterminate weighting of hybrid attributes; and (v) lacked personalized ranking of farms. Motivated by these gaps, this study proposes an integrated decision-making approach using a double-hierarchy hesitant fuzzy context. Firstly, experts' weights are methodically derived via a regret/rejoice measure. Secondly, attributes' weights are determined via an evidence-based rank sum strategy. Thirdly, an algorithm to rank solar farms is formulated with a combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) and the Copeland scheme. Lastly, a case example of sites from India exemplifies the approach's usefulness. Sensitivity analysis and comparison reveal the pros and cons of the developed approach. Results infer that Vellore and Ramanathapuram are two potential locations where a solar farm can be installed, and annual solar irradiation, technology, distance from river, sunshine hours, and land cover are the top five attributes that aid in solar farm location selection. • Vellore is a potential location for setting up a solar farm in Tamil Nadu. • Experts can rate flexibly using natural language form. • Expert weights are methodically determined by regret measure. • Attribute weights are determined objectively and subjectively. • A CODAS-Copeland ranking enables personalized and net ranking of sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108993
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A double hierarchy fuzzy decision approach for solar farm ranking sites in India

Alessio Ishizaka, D. Sundararajan, Raghunathan Krishankumar, K. S. Ravichandran
Energy Economics
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A double hierarchy fuzzy decision approach for solar farm ranking sites in India

Alessio Ishizaka, D. Sundararajan, Raghunathan Krishankumar, K. S. Ravichandran
article en

Abstract

Solar is seen as a potential clean energy solution as world leaders shift energy sources to meet sustainability goals and country demand. Site selection for solar farms is a crucial and complex decision problem involving multiple attributes. Previous studies on site selection (i) could not model natural language preferences; (ii) did not effectively capture expert hesitation; (iii) were prone to the subjective biases of experts; (iv) involved indeterminate weighting of hybrid attributes; and (v) lacked personalized ranking of farms. Motivated by these gaps, this study proposes an integrated decision-making approach using a double-hierarchy hesitant fuzzy context. Firstly, experts' weights are methodically derived via a regret/rejoice measure. Secondly, attributes' weights are determined via an evidence-based rank sum strategy. Thirdly, an algorithm to rank solar farms is formulated with a combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) and the Copeland scheme. Lastly, a case example of sites from India exemplifies the approach's usefulness. Sensitivity analysis and comparison reveal the pros and cons of the developed approach. Results infer that Vellore and Ramanathapuram are two potential locations where a solar farm can be installed, and annual solar irradiation, technology, distance from river, sunshine hours, and land cover are the top five attributes that aid in solar farm location selection. • Vellore is a potential location for setting up a solar farm in Tamil Nadu. • Experts can rate flexibly using natural language form. • Expert weights are methodically determined by regret measure. • Attribute weights are determined objectively and subjectively. • A CODAS-Copeland ranking enables personalized and net ranking of sites.

Energy EconomicsVol. 152
NEOMA Business School (FR), Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (LT), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.