Tax Recovery, Disparity and the Free Movement of Capital in Subnational Autonomous Territories of EU Member States

This note examines the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Ltd v. Provincial Council of Biscay (Case C-601/23), wherein it ruled that the denial of a recovery mechanism for withholding tax in respect of non-resident undertakings in loss-making years violates the free movement of capital under EU law. Despite identical nominal tax rates, the Court found that resident and non-resident undertakings were in objectively comparable situations and that the definitive nature of taxation for non-residents constituted an unjustified restriction. The judgment clarifies that fiscal autonomy at the subnational level, such as autonomous territories, must operate within the bounds of EU law and that territoriality cannot justify unequal outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Taxation
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59403/2chabbc
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tax Recovery, Disparity and the Free Movement of Capital in Subnational Autonomous Territories of EU Member States

Graham Butler
European Taxation
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

Tax Recovery, Disparity and the Free Movement of Capital in Subnational Autonomous Territories of EU Member States

Graham Butler
article en

Abstract

This note examines the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Ltd v. Provincial Council of Biscay (Case C-601/23), wherein it ruled that the denial of a recovery mechanism for withholding tax in respect of non-resident undertakings in loss-making years violates the free movement of capital under EU law. Despite identical nominal tax rates, the Court found that resident and non-resident undertakings were in objectively comparable situations and that the definitive nature of taxation for non-residents constituted an unjustified restriction. The judgment clarifies that fiscal autonomy at the subnational level, such as autonomous territories, must operate within the bounds of EU law and that territoriality cannot justify unequal outcomes.

European TaxationVol. 65(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tax Recovery, Disparity and the Free Movement of Capital in Subnational Autonomous Territories of EU Member States — Graham Butler · European Taxation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS