Minimum energy taxes for climate and clean air in the EU: Environmental and distributional impacts

EU energy taxes could provide a powerful lever to enhance climate action, yet they are characterized by exemptions and are not aligned with climate and environmental goals. This paper assesses the environmental and distributional impacts a revised Energy Taxation Directive, broadening the tax base and increasing the minimum energy tax levels across energy sources, sectors, and EU countries. We combine an economy-wide general equilibrium model and a household-level microsimulation model to quantify the effects on emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants, tax revenue, poverty, inequality, and welfare. Three scenarios consider additive reforms as they gradually stack up energy, climate, and air pollution-based components in the design of minimum energy tax rates. These reforms raise effective energy taxation in the EU roughly by one quarter, by half, and by two-thirds, respectively. Removing exemptions and harmonizing tax rates based on energy content brings down CO 2 and PM 2.5 emissions in the EU by 2–3 %, with substantial heterogeneity across EU countries. Reform scenarios that add climate and air pollution-based tax components lead to stronger emission reductions and reveal environmental co-benefits, as CO 2 -based tax rates lower air pollutant emissions, and tax rates reflecting air pollution damages lower CO 2 emissions. We furthermore quantify the social trade-off between emission reductions and inequality, and illustrate numerically that regressive impacts can be overcome through revenue recycling. The inequality-increasing price effect is partially offset by income-side impacts (before revenue recycling) but is strengthened by cross-country heterogeneity in energy use and taxation. Overall, our findings suggest that gearing the EU's energy tax structure towards environmental sustainability can help deliver a just transition when embedded in a broader policy package. • Removing exemptions in EU energy taxation reduces CO 2 and air pollutant emissions. • We study minimum tax rates that internalize climate & air pollution externalities. • Environmental co-benefits arise as CO 2 taxes reduce PM 2.5 emissions and vice versa. • Without revenue recycling, higher energy prices risk introducing social trade-offs. • Heterogeneity across EU countries strengthens regressivity of energy tax reforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.109001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimum energy taxes for climate and clean air in the EU: Environmental and distributional impacts

Mattia Ricci, Fabian Wagner, Toon Vandyck, Luis Cárdenas del Rey et al.
2 citations
Energy Economics
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.26
article

Minimum energy taxes for climate and clean air in the EU: Environmental and distributional impacts

Mattia Ricci, Fabian Wagner, Toon Vandyck, Luis Cárdenas del Rey, Marie Tamba, Sofía Maier
article en
2 citations

Abstract

EU energy taxes could provide a powerful lever to enhance climate action, yet they are characterized by exemptions and are not aligned with climate and environmental goals. This paper assesses the environmental and distributional impacts a revised Energy Taxation Directive, broadening the tax base and increasing the minimum energy tax levels across energy sources, sectors, and EU countries. We combine an economy-wide general equilibrium model and a household-level microsimulation model to quantify the effects on emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants, tax revenue, poverty, inequality, and welfare. Three scenarios consider additive reforms as they gradually stack up energy, climate, and air pollution-based components in the design of minimum energy tax rates. These reforms raise effective energy taxation in the EU roughly by one quarter, by half, and by two-thirds, respectively. Removing exemptions and harmonizing tax rates based on energy content brings down CO 2 and PM 2.5 emissions in the EU by 2–3 %, with substantial heterogeneity across EU countries. Reform scenarios that add climate and air pollution-based tax components lead to stronger emission reductions and reveal environmental co-benefits, as CO 2 -based tax rates lower air pollutant emissions, and tax rates reflecting air pollution damages lower CO 2 emissions. We furthermore quantify the social trade-off between emission reductions and inequality, and illustrate numerically that regressive impacts can be overcome through revenue recycling. The inequality-increasing price effect is partially offset by income-side impacts (before revenue recycling) but is strengthened by cross-country heterogeneity in energy use and taxation. Overall, our findings suggest that gearing the EU's energy tax structure towards environmental sustainability can help deliver a just transition when embedded in a broader policy package. • Removing exemptions in EU energy taxation reduces CO 2 and air pollutant emissions. • We study minimum tax rates that internalize climate & air pollution externalities. • Environmental co-benefits arise as CO 2 taxes reduce PM 2.5 emissions and vice versa. • Without revenue recycling, higher energy prices risk introducing social trade-offs. • Heterogeneity across EU countries strengthens regressivity of energy tax reforms.

Energy EconomicsVol. 152
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Basque Centre for Climate Change (ES), Joint Research Center (ES), KU Leuven (BE)
European Commission, KU Leuven, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.