Improved residual stress evaluation with Hole-Drilling and DIC through the L-curve tool and super-resolution along depth

Full-field methods such as Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry (ESPI) and Digital Image Correlation (DIC) emerge as promising alternatives to strain rosette in the hole-drilling method, each with its own advantages and limitations. In particular, DIC stands out as a method requiring minimal (and cheap) specimen preparation; however, its sensitivity is approximately one order of magnitude lower than that of conventional strain gauge techniques. We address two fundamental questions. First, how can the inverse problem of the hole-drilling method be systematically approached outside the well-established framework of ASTM E837, which provides users with comprehensive guidance, including automated regularization procedures? Second, thanks to full-field measurement techniques, is it possible to retrieve stress distributions at a spatial resolution finer than the drilling step? We revisit the theoretical development of the inverse problem, aiming to directly identify the residual stresses from raw images, without intermediate pre-processing of the displacement fields. We introduce the L-curve method—well established in other scientific domains—as a rational tool for the choice of the regularization parameter. Finally, we show that, in principle, it would be possible to identify the entire stress distribution from a single drilling increment. We perform a deep rolling treatment on an aluminum specimen and compare the residual stresses identified using both a strain gauge rosette and DIC. We demonstrate that the proposed framework yields results comparable to those obtained using strain gauge rosettes, while minimizing user-dependent arbitrariness. Furthermore, we show that depth super-resolution of at least a factor of two is already achievable with current technological capabilities. • An inverse framework for hole-drilling residual stress analysis with DIC is proposed. • Direct stress identification from raw DIC images without pre-processing of displacements. • The L-curve tool enables rational regularization parameter selection. • DIC achieves depth super-resolution and results comparable to strain gauge rosettes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.119331
Primary Topic
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved residual stress evaluation with Hole-Drilling and DIC through the L-curve tool and super-resolution along depth

Ciro Santus, Paolo Neri, Tommaso Grossi
Measurement
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
article

Improved residual stress evaluation with Hole-Drilling and DIC through the L-curve tool and super-resolution along depth

Ciro Santus, Paolo Neri, Tommaso Grossi
article en

Abstract

Full-field methods such as Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry (ESPI) and Digital Image Correlation (DIC) emerge as promising alternatives to strain rosette in the hole-drilling method, each with its own advantages and limitations. In particular, DIC stands out as a method requiring minimal (and cheap) specimen preparation; however, its sensitivity is approximately one order of magnitude lower than that of conventional strain gauge techniques. We address two fundamental questions. First, how can the inverse problem of the hole-drilling method be systematically approached outside the well-established framework of ASTM E837, which provides users with comprehensive guidance, including automated regularization procedures? Second, thanks to full-field measurement techniques, is it possible to retrieve stress distributions at a spatial resolution finer than the drilling step? We revisit the theoretical development of the inverse problem, aiming to directly identify the residual stresses from raw images, without intermediate pre-processing of the displacement fields. We introduce the L-curve method—well established in other scientific domains—as a rational tool for the choice of the regularization parameter. Finally, we show that, in principle, it would be possible to identify the entire stress distribution from a single drilling increment. We perform a deep rolling treatment on an aluminum specimen and compare the residual stresses identified using both a strain gauge rosette and DIC. We demonstrate that the proposed framework yields results comparable to those obtained using strain gauge rosettes, while minimizing user-dependent arbitrariness. Furthermore, we show that depth super-resolution of at least a factor of two is already achievable with current technological capabilities. • An inverse framework for hole-drilling residual stress analysis with DIC is proposed. • Direct stress identification from raw DIC images without pre-processing of displacements. • The L-curve tool enables rational regularization parameter selection. • DIC achieves depth super-resolution and results comparable to strain gauge rosettes.

MeasurementVol. 258
University of Pisa (IT), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.