Peatland restoration is anticipated to provide climate change mitigation over all time-scales: a UK case-study

Abstract Peatlands provide one of the largest terrestrial carbon stocks in the UK, but a large proportion of peatlands have been drained for peat extraction, agriculture and other uses, turning them into a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Restoration can ultimately return peatlands into carbon sinks. However, rewetting - the primary step in peatland restoration - can reduce CO 2 emissions while increasing CH 4 release. This may result in little overall climate benefit, or even increased warming for several years post peatland restoration, as CH 4 is a short-lived but strong GHG, and may overpower the benefits resulting from the reduction in CO 2 . Most studies are based on comparing total CO 2 -equivalent emissions pre- and post-restoration using the 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP100), which can fail to reveal the full dynamics. We evaluated emissions and resultant climate impacts from peatland restoration using area data from The Wildlife Trusts, a federation of UK-based conservation charities. Emissions were assessed under multiple pulse emission metrics (GWP100, GWP20, GTP100) to indicate impacts over a range of time-horizons, and GWP* to reveal impacts over time. Restoration so far is modelled as providing large emission reductions under all metrics, even considering uncertainties. Increased CH 4 is unlikely to cause extra warming even in the extremely near-term (<20 years), and if peatlands are maintained in their rewetted states, they can contribute to net-cooling in the long term. There is less certainty over the climate benefits of further restoration, from rewetted to ‘near-natural’ states, especially in the shorter term, but we argue that any risks are low, while this continued restoration will provide further ecological benefits and support biodiversity. Our study lends further support for peatland restoration in the UK and other regions with similar habitats, and provides insight into the climate roles of peatlands more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Communications
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae14bb
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peatland restoration is anticipated to provide climate change mitigation over all time-scales: a UK case-study

Nigel Doar, John Lynch, Kathleen M. Brown, Mai Ots et al.
Environmental Research Communications
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
article

Peatland restoration is anticipated to provide climate change mitigation over all time-scales: a UK case-study

Nigel Doar, John Lynch, Kathleen M. Brown, Mai Ots, Zhang Xiao, Eleanor Johnston
article en

Abstract

Abstract Peatlands provide one of the largest terrestrial carbon stocks in the UK, but a large proportion of peatlands have been drained for peat extraction, agriculture and other uses, turning them into a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Restoration can ultimately return peatlands into carbon sinks. However, rewetting - the primary step in peatland restoration - can reduce CO 2 emissions while increasing CH 4 release. This may result in little overall climate benefit, or even increased warming for several years post peatland restoration, as CH 4 is a short-lived but strong GHG, and may overpower the benefits resulting from the reduction in CO 2 . Most studies are based on comparing total CO 2 -equivalent emissions pre- and post-restoration using the 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP100), which can fail to reveal the full dynamics. We evaluated emissions and resultant climate impacts from peatland restoration using area data from The Wildlife Trusts, a federation of UK-based conservation charities. Emissions were assessed under multiple pulse emission metrics (GWP100, GWP20, GTP100) to indicate impacts over a range of time-horizons, and GWP* to reveal impacts over time. Restoration so far is modelled as providing large emission reductions under all metrics, even considering uncertainties. Increased CH 4 is unlikely to cause extra warming even in the extremely near-term (<20 years), and if peatlands are maintained in their rewetted states, they can contribute to net-cooling in the long term. There is less certainty over the climate benefits of further restoration, from rewetted to ‘near-natural’ states, especially in the shorter term, but we argue that any risks are low, while this continued restoration will provide further ecological benefits and support biodiversity. Our study lends further support for peatland restoration in the UK and other regions with similar habitats, and provides insight into the climate roles of peatlands more broadly.

Environmental Research CommunicationsVol. 7(11)
Wildlife Trusts (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University of Tartu (EE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.