Protected areas as zones of paradoxical composition. The case of an area “strictly protected for science”: The Lauvitel integral reserve (France)

This article adopts a spatial perspective to reconceptualise protected areas. We analyse protected areas as zones of paradoxical composition, that is, spaces where an objective of de-inhabitation and an objective of the selective reintroduction of human activities (re-inhabitation) are placed together —composed, in its etymological sense— in often complex and contested ways. Specifically, we examine the close association of conservation with scientific knowledge production, an activity historically intertwined with conservation efforts. Using a longitudinal case study of the Lauvitel integral reserve in France, an area ‘strictly protected for science’, we explore the devices enabling this composition through documentary analysis, semi-structured interviews, and participant observation. Our findings identify three interconnected, spatially distributed devices shaping this composition process: a filtering device at the reserve’s boundary, which regulates selective access; a discretion device within the reserve, maintaining the illusion of an untouched landscape; and a (re)presentation device beyond the reserve, fostering mediated access while sustaining the reserve’s exclusivity. We thus illuminate how protected areas are not simply exclusionary spaces but are shaped by negotiated and spatially differentiated forms of human presence. Our approach to protected areas as zones of paradoxical composition sheds new light on scientific presence in protected areas, engages with questions of Earth’s habitability, and opens avenues for future research on environmental justice. • De- and re-inhabitation objectives are placed together, or composed, in protected areas. • Protected areas can thus be analysed as zones of paradoxical composition. • They are established and maintained through specific devices. • They are inherently exposed to critiques in terms of environmental justice. • Doing science is a key albeit often unaccounted for way of inhabiting protected areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104257
Primary Topic
French Urban and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protected areas as zones of paradoxical composition. The case of an area “strictly protected for science”: The Lauvitel integral reserve (France)

Kewan Mertens, Isabelle Arpin, Quentin Bouchu
Environmental Science & Policy
French Urban and Social Studies
article

Protected areas as zones of paradoxical composition. The case of an area “strictly protected for science”: The Lauvitel integral reserve (France)

Kewan Mertens, Isabelle Arpin, Quentin Bouchu
article en

Abstract

This article adopts a spatial perspective to reconceptualise protected areas. We analyse protected areas as zones of paradoxical composition, that is, spaces where an objective of de-inhabitation and an objective of the selective reintroduction of human activities (re-inhabitation) are placed together —composed, in its etymological sense— in often complex and contested ways. Specifically, we examine the close association of conservation with scientific knowledge production, an activity historically intertwined with conservation efforts. Using a longitudinal case study of the Lauvitel integral reserve in France, an area ‘strictly protected for science’, we explore the devices enabling this composition through documentary analysis, semi-structured interviews, and participant observation. Our findings identify three interconnected, spatially distributed devices shaping this composition process: a filtering device at the reserve’s boundary, which regulates selective access; a discretion device within the reserve, maintaining the illusion of an untouched landscape; and a (re)presentation device beyond the reserve, fostering mediated access while sustaining the reserve’s exclusivity. We thus illuminate how protected areas are not simply exclusionary spaces but are shaped by negotiated and spatially differentiated forms of human presence. Our approach to protected areas as zones of paradoxical composition sheds new light on scientific presence in protected areas, engages with questions of Earth’s habitability, and opens avenues for future research on environmental justice. • De- and re-inhabitation objectives are placed together, or composed, in protected areas. • Protected areas can thus be analysed as zones of paradoxical composition. • They are established and maintained through specific devices. • They are inherently exposed to critiques in terms of environmental justice. • Doing science is a key albeit often unaccounted for way of inhabiting protected areas.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 173
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre de sociologie de l'innovation (FR), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
French Urban and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.