Fairness verification algorithms and bias mitigation mechanisms for AI criminal justice decision systems

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized in criminal justice systems to support decisions related to bail, sentencing, and parole. However, these systems often perpetuate historical biases, particularly racial disparities embedded in the training data. Many existing models lack effective mechanisms for verifying fairness and mitigating bias, resulting in unequal outcomes for legally protected groups. This research aims to develop a structured machine learning (ML) framework that integrates Fairness Verification Algorithms with mitigation strategies to enhance fairness in criminal risk assessment. The framework employs Extreme Gradient Boosted K-Means Clustering (XGBoost-KMC), trained exclusively on data from White offenders, to minimize bias during model development. The dataset comprises 200,000 arraignment records from a metropolitan court system, including demographic and criminal history variables. Pre-processing steps involve removing sensitive attributes such as race and zip code, applying Z-score normalization, and addressing class imbalance using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used for feature extraction, reducing dimensionality while preserving key predictive information. To mitigate bias, the model applies optimal transport to align the feature distribution of Black offenders with that of White offenders. It generates calibrated and uncertainty-aware risk forecasts using conformal prediction sets. Fairness Verification Algorithms assess the model’s outputs using statistical metrics such as prediction parity and classification parity across demographic groups. The model achieves an average accuracy of above 93% with 5-fold cross-validation, demonstrating both fairness and predictive capability. Results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves a Pareto improvement, enhancing fairness for disadvantaged groups without compromising predictive accuracy. This approach provides a scalable and transparent solution for building equitable AI systems in criminal justice applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978251385141
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fairness verification algorithms and bias mitigation mechanisms for AI criminal justice decision systems

L. S. Zheng
Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Fairness verification algorithms and bias mitigation mechanisms for AI criminal justice decision systems

L. S. Zheng
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized in criminal justice systems to support decisions related to bail, sentencing, and parole. However, these systems often perpetuate historical biases, particularly racial disparities embedded in the training data. Many existing models lack effective mechanisms for verifying fairness and mitigating bias, resulting in unequal outcomes for legally protected groups. This research aims to develop a structured machine learning (ML) framework that integrates Fairness Verification Algorithms with mitigation strategies to enhance fairness in criminal risk assessment. The framework employs Extreme Gradient Boosted K-Means Clustering (XGBoost-KMC), trained exclusively on data from White offenders, to minimize bias during model development. The dataset comprises 200,000 arraignment records from a metropolitan court system, including demographic and criminal history variables. Pre-processing steps involve removing sensitive attributes such as race and zip code, applying Z-score normalization, and addressing class imbalance using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used for feature extraction, reducing dimensionality while preserving key predictive information. To mitigate bias, the model applies optimal transport to align the feature distribution of Black offenders with that of White offenders. It generates calibrated and uncertainty-aware risk forecasts using conformal prediction sets. Fairness Verification Algorithms assess the model’s outputs using statistical metrics such as prediction parity and classification parity across demographic groups. The model achieves an average accuracy of above 93% with 5-fold cross-validation, demonstrating both fairness and predictive capability. Results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves a Pareto improvement, enhancing fairness for disadvantaged groups without compromising predictive accuracy. This approach provides a scalable and transparent solution for building equitable AI systems in criminal justice applications.

Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering
Henan Forestry Vocational College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.