Neutral and Abilitative/Involuntariness Morphology in Waray: A Comparative Analysis of the g- Prefix

This paper seeks to evaluate the proposed g- prefix in Waray according to Dell’s (1983) “Neutral (N) and Abilitative/involuntariness (AIA)” analysis for the closely related language Tagalog. Payne and Oyzon (2010) interpret the g- as a standalone morpheme denoting what they call “deliberate mood.” Others see the g- as a part of the prefixes nag-, mag-, gin-, etc. (Rubino 2001, Diller 1971). I will demonstrate that Payne and Oyzon’s “deliberate mood” is likely not necessary. Thus, my paper will provide an analysis that is preferable because it demonstrates that Waray agrees with other analyses in the Philippine-type literature. To accomplish this, I will use Waray data to show that when the g- prefix is used (here, interpreted as N morphology), the action only entails the maneuver and intention not the result, even though it may be heavily implied. Conversely, the AIA morphology entails the result, while not directly entailing either maneuver or intention. Thus, Dell’s analysis for Tagalog works quite well for Waray and allows us to account for g- as “deliberate mood.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language Culture and Religion
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64830/001c.143227
Primary Topic
Lexicography and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neutral and Abilitative/Involuntariness Morphology in Waray: A Comparative Analysis of the g- Prefix

Carter Ehnis
Journal of Language Culture and Religion
Lexicography and Language Studies
article

Neutral and Abilitative/Involuntariness Morphology in Waray: A Comparative Analysis of the g- Prefix

Carter Ehnis
article en

Abstract

This paper seeks to evaluate the proposed g- prefix in Waray according to Dell’s (1983) “Neutral (N) and Abilitative/involuntariness (AIA)” analysis for the closely related language Tagalog. Payne and Oyzon (2010) interpret the g- as a standalone morpheme denoting what they call “deliberate mood.” Others see the g- as a part of the prefixes nag-, mag-, gin-, etc. (Rubino 2001, Diller 1971). I will demonstrate that Payne and Oyzon’s “deliberate mood” is likely not necessary. Thus, my paper will provide an analysis that is preferable because it demonstrates that Waray agrees with other analyses in the Philippine-type literature. To accomplish this, I will use Waray data to show that when the g- prefix is used (here, interpreted as N morphology), the action only entails the maneuver and intention not the result, even though it may be heavily implied. Conversely, the AIA morphology entails the result, while not directly entailing either maneuver or intention. Thus, Dell’s analysis for Tagalog works quite well for Waray and allows us to account for g- as “deliberate mood.”

Journal of Language Culture and ReligionVol. 6(1)
International University (KH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Lexicography and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.