Learning new collocations: The effects of grouping and language of instruction

The study investigated the effects of two factors on learning new L2 collocations: 1) the way collocations are grouped when introduced and practiced (thematically related vs. unrelated sets), and 2) the language(s) used for instruction (L2 only vs. L1-L2 contrastive analysis). Thirty-seven Israeli English as a foreign language learners studied 20 new collocations under four conditions: Thematic/L2, Thematic/L1-L2, Unrelated/L2, Unrelated/L1-L2. Comprehension and production tests measured collocation learning. Results showed an effect for both variables, with the Unrelated/L1-L2 condition yielding the best results and Thematic/L2 the worst. The results were discussed in light of the Interference Theory in collocation clusters, L1-L2 awareness raising, and the effectiveness of form-focused instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
System
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103873
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning new collocations: The effects of grouping and language of instruction

Batia Laufer, Ronit Breslaw
System
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Learning new collocations: The effects of grouping and language of instruction

Batia Laufer, Ronit Breslaw
article en

Abstract

The study investigated the effects of two factors on learning new L2 collocations: 1) the way collocations are grouped when introduced and practiced (thematically related vs. unrelated sets), and 2) the language(s) used for instruction (L2 only vs. L1-L2 contrastive analysis). Thirty-seven Israeli English as a foreign language learners studied 20 new collocations under four conditions: Thematic/L2, Thematic/L1-L2, Unrelated/L2, Unrelated/L1-L2. Comprehension and production tests measured collocation learning. Results showed an effect for both variables, with the Unrelated/L1-L2 condition yielding the best results and Thematic/L2 the worst. The results were discussed in light of the Interference Theory in collocation clusters, L1-L2 awareness raising, and the effectiveness of form-focused instruction.

SystemVol. 136
University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.