Mathematical Oncology: How Modeling Is Transforming Clinical Decision-Making

Mathematical models have played a significant role in the development of current chemo- and radiotherapy treatment protocols. The widespread use of cytotoxic drugs has shaped the paradigm of uniformly administering a "maximum tolerated dose" to patients; however, this approach fails to account for the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of challenging cancers, including metastatic disease. Recent clinical trials and regulatory decisions have aimed to address these issues by integrating mathematical models to drive preclinical experiments and personalize treatment schedules. By capturing mechanisms of dose-response dynamics, ecological dynamics such as tumor-immune interactions or competition dynamics, and evolutionary dynamics across different therapeutic regimens, mathematical models hold the potential to advance current therapeutic strategies. As more preclinical and clinical data become available, the integration of mathematical models with "virtual patient" frameworks, including "digital twins," and artificial intelligence methods could further advance the mechanistic complexity and decision support capabilities of such models. Nonetheless, translating mechanistic models to routine clinical workflows will require overcoming current translational barriers, notably access to clinical data in standardized formats and regulatory constraints. Overall, recent trials demonstrate the promise of the field of mathematical oncology in translating predictive dynamics into treatment decision-making beyond the "maximum tolerated dose" approach. This article is part of a special series: Driving Cancer Discoveries with Computational Research, Data Science, and Machine Learning/AI .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-25-0750
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematical Oncology: How Modeling Is Transforming Clinical Decision-Making

Kevin Scibilia, M. A. Masud, P. Llamas, Jill Gallaher et al.
3 citations
Cancer Research
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
4.10
article

Mathematical Oncology: How Modeling Is Transforming Clinical Decision-Making

Kevin Scibilia, M. A. Masud, P. Llamas, Jill Gallaher, Jeffrey West, Kit Gallagher, Chandler Gatenbee, Alexander R.A. Anderson, Sandhya Prabhakaran, Mark Robertson‐Tessi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Mathematical models have played a significant role in the development of current chemo- and radiotherapy treatment protocols. The widespread use of cytotoxic drugs has shaped the paradigm of uniformly administering a "maximum tolerated dose" to patients; however, this approach fails to account for the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of challenging cancers, including metastatic disease. Recent clinical trials and regulatory decisions have aimed to address these issues by integrating mathematical models to drive preclinical experiments and personalize treatment schedules. By capturing mechanisms of dose-response dynamics, ecological dynamics such as tumor-immune interactions or competition dynamics, and evolutionary dynamics across different therapeutic regimens, mathematical models hold the potential to advance current therapeutic strategies. As more preclinical and clinical data become available, the integration of mathematical models with "virtual patient" frameworks, including "digital twins," and artificial intelligence methods could further advance the mechanistic complexity and decision support capabilities of such models. Nonetheless, translating mechanistic models to routine clinical workflows will require overcoming current translational barriers, notably access to clinical data in standardized formats and regulatory constraints. Overall, recent trials demonstrate the promise of the field of mathematical oncology in translating predictive dynamics into treatment decision-making beyond the "maximum tolerated dose" approach. This article is part of a special series: Driving Cancer Discoveries with Computational Research, Data Science, and Machine Learning/AI .

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(24)
Moffitt Cancer Center (US), University of Oxford (GB), Mathematical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
4.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.