Standardizing rare disease data in Brazil: a Delphi-based approach for the First National Registry

Abstract Introduction Rare diseases (RD) are characterized by low prevalence, affecting fewer than 1 in 2,000 individuals, yet impacting millions globally. In Brazil, RD management is challenged by geographic disparities and unequal access to care. To address these gaps, the Brazilian Rare Diseases Network (RARAS) developed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) to standardize RD documentation. Objective To validate the proposed MDS through a Delphi consensus process with clinical experts. Methods This study used the Delphi method to validate the MDS, involving clinical experts. A structured questionnaire with 55 items across nine data categories was distributed via REDCap. Experts evaluated the relevance of each variable and reached a consensus, which was defined as ≥ 80% agreement. Results Fifty-two professionals were invited; 16 responded in round one, and 11 in round two. Suggestions for additions and removals were reviewed after each round. Seven data categories achieved over 81.8% agreement, reaching consensus levels between 90.9% and 100%. The final MDS includes care indicators and facilitates consistent documentation and care coordination. Conclusions This study demonstrates the value of standardized data collection in strengthening RD surveillance, clinical workflows, and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rare Diseases
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44162-025-00123-9
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardizing rare disease data in Brazil: a Delphi-based approach for the First National Registry

Claudia Fernandes Lorea, Diego Bettiol Yamada, Tatiana Takahasi Komoto, Têmis Maria Félix et al.
Journal of Rare Diseases
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Standardizing rare disease data in Brazil: a Delphi-based approach for the First National Registry

Claudia Fernandes Lorea, Diego Bettiol Yamada, Tatiana Takahasi Komoto, Têmis Maria Félix, Filipe Andrade Bernardi, Domingos Alves, Bibiana Mello de Oliveira, Michele de Souza Seixas, André Luiz Teixeira Vinci
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Rare diseases (RD) are characterized by low prevalence, affecting fewer than 1 in 2,000 individuals, yet impacting millions globally. In Brazil, RD management is challenged by geographic disparities and unequal access to care. To address these gaps, the Brazilian Rare Diseases Network (RARAS) developed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) to standardize RD documentation. Objective To validate the proposed MDS through a Delphi consensus process with clinical experts. Methods This study used the Delphi method to validate the MDS, involving clinical experts. A structured questionnaire with 55 items across nine data categories was distributed via REDCap. Experts evaluated the relevance of each variable and reached a consensus, which was defined as ≥ 80% agreement. Results Fifty-two professionals were invited; 16 responded in round one, and 11 in round two. Suggestions for additions and removals were reviewed after each round. Seven data categories achieved over 81.8% agreement, reaching consensus levels between 90.9% and 100%. The final MDS includes care indicators and facilitates consistent documentation and care coordination. Conclusions This study demonstrates the value of standardized data collection in strengthening RD surveillance, clinical workflows, and research.

Journal of Rare DiseasesVol. 4(1)
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade do Porto (PT), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.