Integrated Technical–Economic–Environmental Evaluation of Available Technologies for Heavy Metal Wastewater Treatment Used in Lead–Zinc Smelting in the Yellow River Basin

Evaluating the efficacy of available technology for pollutant treatment is critical for formulating environmental management policies and standards. To address the lack of systematic quantitative methods for evaluating available technology, we propose a method based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS model which integrates technology, economic efficiency, environmental benefits, and operational feasibility. We applied this approach to evaluate six heavy metal wastewater treatment technologies used in the lead–zinc smelting industry in the Yellow River Basin of China. A total of 4 primary and 16 secondary evaluation indicators were identified. The data were mainly composed of supervised monitoring data collected by local environmental protection authorities and self-monitoring operation data collected from factories; moreover, 10 relevant experts were invited to assess the scoring indicators. The results showed that technical performance had the greatest contribution to the overall efficacy of the treatment technology (62.31% weight), followed by environmental benefits (14.24% weight), economic costs (12.08% weight), and operational feasibility (11.36% weight). The final scores and rankings of the six technologies evaluated showed that a sulfurization precipitation with two-stage lime neutralization and sedimentation technology received the highest score due to its balanced technical performance, economic cost, environmental benefits, and operational feasibility. Conversely, lime neutralization with flocculation precipitation technology ranked lowest due to its non-compliance with the emission limits in China, despite its low economic cost and carbon emission intensity. This study provides a quantitative methodological framework for evaluating available technology, emphasizing the balance of the technical, economic, and environmental benefits of the pollutant treatment technologies chosen and the relevant policies made.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209188
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Technical–Economic–Environmental Evaluation of Available Technologies for Heavy Metal Wastewater Treatment Used in Lead–Zinc Smelting in the Yellow River Basin

Yafeng Wu, Zhou Yu-hua, Hao Fang
Sustainability
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
article

Integrated Technical–Economic–Environmental Evaluation of Available Technologies for Heavy Metal Wastewater Treatment Used in Lead–Zinc Smelting in the Yellow River Basin

Yafeng Wu, Zhou Yu-hua, Hao Fang
article en

Abstract

Evaluating the efficacy of available technology for pollutant treatment is critical for formulating environmental management policies and standards. To address the lack of systematic quantitative methods for evaluating available technology, we propose a method based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS model which integrates technology, economic efficiency, environmental benefits, and operational feasibility. We applied this approach to evaluate six heavy metal wastewater treatment technologies used in the lead–zinc smelting industry in the Yellow River Basin of China. A total of 4 primary and 16 secondary evaluation indicators were identified. The data were mainly composed of supervised monitoring data collected by local environmental protection authorities and self-monitoring operation data collected from factories; moreover, 10 relevant experts were invited to assess the scoring indicators. The results showed that technical performance had the greatest contribution to the overall efficacy of the treatment technology (62.31% weight), followed by environmental benefits (14.24% weight), economic costs (12.08% weight), and operational feasibility (11.36% weight). The final scores and rankings of the six technologies evaluated showed that a sulfurization precipitation with two-stage lime neutralization and sedimentation technology received the highest score due to its balanced technical performance, economic cost, environmental benefits, and operational feasibility. Conversely, lime neutralization with flocculation precipitation technology ranked lowest due to its non-compliance with the emission limits in China, despite its low economic cost and carbon emission intensity. This study provides a quantitative methodological framework for evaluating available technology, emphasizing the balance of the technical, economic, and environmental benefits of the pollutant treatment technologies chosen and the relevant policies made.

SustainabilityVol. 17(20)
Ministry of Ecology and Environment (CN), Beijing Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau (CN), Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.