Trade as Villain: Belief in the American Dream and Declining Support for Globalization

Why has US commercial policy become increasingly politicized in the twenty-first century?We argue that this politicization reflects an interaction between elite rhetoric on unfair trade practices and American meritocratic values. As the twenty-first century progressed, elites increasingly argued that economic malaise was a result of predatory practices by US trading partners. This “trade is unfair” rhetoric resonated most strongly with meritocratic Americans: individuals who believed in principles of market fairness but also worried about future economic prospects. To evaluate the argument that trade policy frames resonate differently among Americans, we draw on data from several survey experiments as well as a large, original panel data set with repeat observations of the same individuals. Individuals who are most tied to the myth of the classic American Dream are the most likely to respond to a frame blaming unfair trade for America’s economic problems, and this contributes to rising antiglobalization sentiment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/xdeh-0h26
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade as Villain: Belief in the American Dream and Declining Support for Globalization

Nita Rudra, Cameron Ballard-Rosa, Judith L. Goldstein
UNC Libraries
Economic Theory and Policy
article

Trade as Villain: Belief in the American Dream and Declining Support for Globalization

Nita Rudra, Cameron Ballard-Rosa, Judith L. Goldstein
article en

Abstract

Why has US commercial policy become increasingly politicized in the twenty-first century?We argue that this politicization reflects an interaction between elite rhetoric on unfair trade practices and American meritocratic values. As the twenty-first century progressed, elites increasingly argued that economic malaise was a result of predatory practices by US trading partners. This “trade is unfair” rhetoric resonated most strongly with meritocratic Americans: individuals who believed in principles of market fairness but also worried about future economic prospects. To evaluate the argument that trade policy frames resonate differently among Americans, we draw on data from several survey experiments as well as a large, original panel data set with repeat observations of the same individuals. Individuals who are most tied to the myth of the classic American Dream are the most likely to respond to a frame blaming unfair trade for America’s economic problems, and this contributes to rising antiglobalization sentiment.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
American Political Science Association, Princeton University, Harvard University, Georgetown University, Dartmouth College, University College London, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Economic Theory and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trade as Villain: Belief in the American Dream and Declining Support for Globalization — Nita Rudra, Cameron Ballard-Rosa, et al. · UNC Libraries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS