Review of Dynamic Resting‐State Methods in Neuroimaging: Applications to Depression and Rumination

Large-scale functional brain networks have most commonly been evaluated using static methods that assess patterns of activation or functional connectivity over an extended period. However, this approach does not capture time-varying features of functional networks, such as variability in functional connectivity or transient network states that form and dissolve over time. Addressing this gap, dynamic methods for analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data estimate time-varying properties of brain functioning. In the context of resting-state neuroimaging, dynamic methods can reveal spontaneously occurring network configurations and temporal properties of such networks. Patterns of network functioning over time during the resting state may be indicative of individual differences in cognitive-affective processes such as rumination, or the tendency to engage in a pattern of repetitive negative thinking. We first introduce the current landscape of dynamic methods and then review an emerging body of literature applying these methods to the study of rumination and depression to illustrate how dynamic methods may be used to study clinical and cognitive phenomena. An emerging body of research suggests that rumination is related to altered functional flexibility of brain networks that overlap with the canonical default mode network. An important future direction for dynamic fMRI analyses is to explore associations with more specific features of cognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Brain Mapping
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70377
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of Dynamic Resting‐State Methods in Neuroimaging: Applications to Depression and Rumination

Amelia D. Moser, Elena C. Peterson, Roselinde H. Kaiser, Harry R. Smolker
2 citations
Human Brain Mapping
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
2.86
article

Review of Dynamic Resting‐State Methods in Neuroimaging: Applications to Depression and Rumination

Amelia D. Moser, Elena C. Peterson, Roselinde H. Kaiser, Harry R. Smolker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Large-scale functional brain networks have most commonly been evaluated using static methods that assess patterns of activation or functional connectivity over an extended period. However, this approach does not capture time-varying features of functional networks, such as variability in functional connectivity or transient network states that form and dissolve over time. Addressing this gap, dynamic methods for analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data estimate time-varying properties of brain functioning. In the context of resting-state neuroimaging, dynamic methods can reveal spontaneously occurring network configurations and temporal properties of such networks. Patterns of network functioning over time during the resting state may be indicative of individual differences in cognitive-affective processes such as rumination, or the tendency to engage in a pattern of repetitive negative thinking. We first introduce the current landscape of dynamic methods and then review an emerging body of literature applying these methods to the study of rumination and depression to illustrate how dynamic methods may be used to study clinical and cognitive phenomena. An emerging body of research suggests that rumination is related to altered functional flexibility of brain networks that overlap with the canonical default mode network. An important future direction for dynamic fMRI analyses is to explore associations with more specific features of cognition.

Human Brain MappingVol. 46(15)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US)
National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Review of Dynamic Resting‐State Methods in Neuroimaging: Applications to Depression and Rumination — Amelia D. Moser, Elena C. Peterson, et al. · Human Brain Mapping (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS