Congestion Management Games in Electricity Markets
This paper proposes a game-theoretic model to analyze the strategic behavior of inc-dec gaming in market-based congestion management (redispatch). We extend existing models by considering incomplete information about competitors’ costs and a finite set of providers. We find that inc-dec gaming is also a rational behavior in markets with high competition and with uncertainty about network constraints. Such behavior already occurs in our setup of two regions. Comparing market-based redispatch with three theoretical benchmarks highlights a lower efficiency level of market-based redispatch and inflated redispatch payments. Finally, we study seven variations of our basic model to assess whether different market fundamentals or market design changes mitigate inc-dec gaming. None of these variations eliminates inc-dec gaming entirely. JEL Classification: D43 Market Structure, Pricing, and Design: Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; D44 Auctions; L13 Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets; Q41 Energy: Demand and Supply; Prices; Q48 Energy: Government Policy
Authors
- Anselm Eicke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-3628)
- Fabian Ocker
- Marion Ott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5199-4664)
- Ingmar Schlecht (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3436-3902)
- Lion Hirth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-3310)
- Karl‐Martin Ehrhart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-5835)
- Runxi Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-0583)
Institutions
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Centre for European Economic Research (DE)
- Bayreuth Medical Center (DE)
- Tennet (Germany) (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Energy Journal
- Published
- 2025-10-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/01956574251365606
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Electric Power System Optimization
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.73