Congestion Management Games in Electricity Markets

This paper proposes a game-theoretic model to analyze the strategic behavior of inc-dec gaming in market-based congestion management (redispatch). We extend existing models by considering incomplete information about competitors’ costs and a finite set of providers. We find that inc-dec gaming is also a rational behavior in markets with high competition and with uncertainty about network constraints. Such behavior already occurs in our setup of two regions. Comparing market-based redispatch with three theoretical benchmarks highlights a lower efficiency level of market-based redispatch and inflated redispatch payments. Finally, we study seven variations of our basic model to assess whether different market fundamentals or market design changes mitigate inc-dec gaming. None of these variations eliminates inc-dec gaming entirely. JEL Classification: D43 Market Structure, Pricing, and Design: Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; D44 Auctions; L13 Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets; Q41 Energy: Demand and Supply; Prices; Q48 Energy: Government Policy

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Energy Journal
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01956574251365606
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electric Power System Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Congestion Management Games in Electricity Markets

Anselm Eicke, Fabian Ocker, Marion Ott, Ingmar Schlecht et al.
1 citations
The Energy Journal
Electric Power System Optimization
0.73
article

Congestion Management Games in Electricity Markets

Anselm Eicke, Fabian Ocker, Marion Ott, Ingmar Schlecht, Lion Hirth, Karl‐Martin Ehrhart, Runxi Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper proposes a game-theoretic model to analyze the strategic behavior of inc-dec gaming in market-based congestion management (redispatch). We extend existing models by considering incomplete information about competitors’ costs and a finite set of providers. We find that inc-dec gaming is also a rational behavior in markets with high competition and with uncertainty about network constraints. Such behavior already occurs in our setup of two regions. Comparing market-based redispatch with three theoretical benchmarks highlights a lower efficiency level of market-based redispatch and inflated redispatch payments. Finally, we study seven variations of our basic model to assess whether different market fundamentals or market design changes mitigate inc-dec gaming. None of these variations eliminates inc-dec gaming entirely. JEL Classification: D43 Market Structure, Pricing, and Design: Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; D44 Auctions; L13 Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets; Q41 Energy: Demand and Supply; Prices; Q48 Energy: Government Policy

The Energy JournalVol. 47(1)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Centre for European Economic Research (DE), Bayreuth Medical Center (DE), Tennet (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Electric Power System Optimization
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.