Validation of an immunohistochemistry-based molecular group stratification of intracranial meningiomas

We sought to validate previously proposed immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers that classify meningiomas into 4 molecular groups (MG) with superior predictive ability of progression compared to World Health Organization (WHO) grade. IHC for target proteins S100B, SCGN, ACADL, and MCM2 corresponding to molecular groups 1-4, respectively, was performed on 85 surgically resected primary meningiomas across WHO grades 1-3. Additional IHC for FOXM1 was included as a potential predictor of aggressiveness. All slides were digitally analyzed for percent of cells staining positive. The primary outcome measure was time to progression. In addition, 9% cell positivity was identified as the optimal cutoff although 31% of tumors could not be classified and only 53% (n = 45) were positive for a single, unique molecular group. Within these uniquely categorized tumors, there was no significant difference in time to progression between MG1-2 versus MG3-4 (P = .7). In a separate analysis, high staining of MCM2 (MG4) was associated with shorter time to progression (P = .02). Although the previously proposed IHC targets to identify molecular groups were not meaningfully reproducible in our analysis, MCM2 staining alone correlated with shorter time to progression across all grades and may be a simple, cost-effective IHC marker to identify clinically aggressive meningiomas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlaf120
Primary Topic
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of an immunohistochemistry-based molecular group stratification of intracranial meningiomas

Mohamed E. El-Abtah, Varun R. Kshettry, Tiffany Ejikeme, Pablo F. Recinos et al.
Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Meningioma and schwannoma management
article

Validation of an immunohistochemistry-based molecular group stratification of intracranial meningiomas

Mohamed E. El-Abtah, Varun R. Kshettry, Tiffany Ejikeme, Pablo F. Recinos, Roger Murayi, Richard A. Prayson, Tianqi Xiao, Pranay Soni
article en

Abstract

We sought to validate previously proposed immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers that classify meningiomas into 4 molecular groups (MG) with superior predictive ability of progression compared to World Health Organization (WHO) grade. IHC for target proteins S100B, SCGN, ACADL, and MCM2 corresponding to molecular groups 1-4, respectively, was performed on 85 surgically resected primary meningiomas across WHO grades 1-3. Additional IHC for FOXM1 was included as a potential predictor of aggressiveness. All slides were digitally analyzed for percent of cells staining positive. The primary outcome measure was time to progression. In addition, 9% cell positivity was identified as the optimal cutoff although 31% of tumors could not be classified and only 53% (n = 45) were positive for a single, unique molecular group. Within these uniquely categorized tumors, there was no significant difference in time to progression between MG1-2 versus MG3-4 (P = .7). In a separate analysis, high staining of MCM2 (MG4) was associated with shorter time to progression (P = .02). Although the previously proposed IHC targets to identify molecular groups were not meaningfully reproducible in our analysis, MCM2 staining alone correlated with shorter time to progression across all grades and may be a simple, cost-effective IHC marker to identify clinically aggressive meningiomas.

Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental NeurologyVol. 85(2)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), University School (US), Neurological Surgery (US), The Neurological Institute (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Meningioma and schwannoma management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.