Readers’ attention to shorter versus longer abstracts of systematic reviews: a randomised controlled trial

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ evidence-based medicine
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113613
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Readers’ attention to shorter versus longer abstracts of systematic reviews: a randomised controlled trial

Jasmin Helbach, Dawid Pieper, Falk Hoffmann, Kathrin Wandscher
BMJ evidence-based medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Readers’ attention to shorter versus longer abstracts of systematic reviews: a randomised controlled trial

Jasmin Helbach, Dawid Pieper, Falk Hoffmann, Kathrin Wandscher
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
BMJ evidence-based medicine
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Readers’ attention to shorter versus longer abstracts of systematic reviews: a randomised controlled trial — Jasmin Helbach, Dawid Pieper, et al. · BMJ evidence-based medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS