Industrial Palletizing Robots: A Distance-Based Objective Weighting Benchmarking

In the context of increasingly strong digital transformation and production automation, choosing the right palletizing robot plays a key role in optimizing operational efficiency in industrial chains. However, the wide variety of robot types and specifications complicates decision-making and increases the risk of biased judgments. To overcome this challenge, this study develops an objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that integrates two complementary methods for selecting the optimal industrial pal-letizing robot in the context of modern manufacturing that is increasingly dependent on intelligent automation solutions. Specifically, an improved CRITIC approach is employed to determine objective criteria weights by refining the measurement of contrast intensity and inter-criteria conflict, while normalization ensures comparability of heterogeneous robot parameters. CRADIS is then applied to rank the alternatives based on their relative closeness to the ideal solution. The contributions of this study are twofold: methodological, enhancing the objectivity and robustness of weighting through refined CRITIC and normalization, and practical, offering a reproducible evaluation framework for managers when choosing industrial robots. Application to eight palletizing robots demonstrates that “repeatability” and “power consumption” significantly influence rankings. Sensitivity analysis further confirms the model’s stability and reliability. These findings not only support evidence-based investment decisions but also provide a foundation for extending the method to other industrial technology selection problems.