Assessment of Heavy Metals in Mexican Dietary Supplements Using Total X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry and Health Risk Evaluation

This study used Total X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (TXRF) to analyze toxic heavy metals, specifically lead (Pb), arsenic (As), and chromium (Cr), in 45 dietary supplement samples consumed by the Mexican population. A health risk assessment was performed using the Target Hazard Quotient (THQ), Hazard Index (HI), and Cumulative Cancer Risk (CCR). The mean concentrations of Pb, Cr, and As were found to be 1.99 ± 0.13, 26.88 ± 0.23, and 2.39 ± 0.11 mg/kg, respectively. For Pb, 80% of dietary supplements showed low EDIs compared to the reference value of 1.08 × 10<sup>-4</sup> mg/Kg bw/day set by the FDA. For Cr, 100% of the analyzed products had EDIs below the limit of 0.3 mg/Kg bw/day established by EFSA. Additionally, some dietary supplements of animal origin had EDIs exceeding the reference value of 6 × 10<sup>-5</sup> mg/kg bw/day set by the Integrated Risk System and EFSA for daily arsenic intake. When evaluating the variables THQ_Pb, THQ_Cr, and THQ_As using mean comparison tests to determine whether they exceeded the reference value of 1, we found that, in general, the available statistical evidence is insufficient (<i>p</i> > 0.05) to conclusively state that the dietary supplements under review surpass this reference parameter. Regarding HI values, the Animal and Vegetable category showed higher values than 1. All dietary supplements had CCR values in ranges greater than 1 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, indicating a probability of an individual developing cancer over their lifetime due to metal exposure. Effectively communicating these risks to consumers is crucial for promoting informed choices and improving public health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203534
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heavy Metals in Plants
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Heavy Metals in Mexican Dietary Supplements Using Total X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry and Health Risk Evaluation

Blanca Gladiana Beltrán Piña, Eduardo Santellano‐Estrada, Jorge Octavio Acosta-Montes, Cardona-Mejía Mariana et al.
1 citations
Foods
Heavy Metals in Plants
0.75
article

Assessment of Heavy Metals in Mexican Dietary Supplements Using Total X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry and Health Risk Evaluation

Blanca Gladiana Beltrán Piña, Eduardo Santellano‐Estrada, Jorge Octavio Acosta-Montes, Cardona-Mejía Mariana, Aguilar-Maldonado Paulina, Chávez-Calderón Adriana
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study used Total X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (TXRF) to analyze toxic heavy metals, specifically lead (Pb), arsenic (As), and chromium (Cr), in 45 dietary supplement samples consumed by the Mexican population. A health risk assessment was performed using the Target Hazard Quotient (THQ), Hazard Index (HI), and Cumulative Cancer Risk (CCR). The mean concentrations of Pb, Cr, and As were found to be 1.99 ± 0.13, 26.88 ± 0.23, and 2.39 ± 0.11 mg/kg, respectively. For Pb, 80% of dietary supplements showed low EDIs compared to the reference value of 1.08 × 10<sup>-4</sup> mg/Kg bw/day set by the FDA. For Cr, 100% of the analyzed products had EDIs below the limit of 0.3 mg/Kg bw/day established by EFSA. Additionally, some dietary supplements of animal origin had EDIs exceeding the reference value of 6 × 10<sup>-5</sup> mg/kg bw/day set by the Integrated Risk System and EFSA for daily arsenic intake. When evaluating the variables THQ_Pb, THQ_Cr, and THQ_As using mean comparison tests to determine whether they exceeded the reference value of 1, we found that, in general, the available statistical evidence is insufficient (<i>p</i> > 0.05) to conclusively state that the dietary supplements under review surpass this reference parameter. Regarding HI values, the Animal and Vegetable category showed higher values than 1. All dietary supplements had CCR values in ranges greater than 1 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, indicating a probability of an individual developing cancer over their lifetime due to metal exposure. Effectively communicating these risks to consumers is crucial for promoting informed choices and improving public health.

FoodsVol. 14(20)
Autonomous University of Chihuahua (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Heavy Metals in Plants
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of Heavy Metals in Mexican Dietary Supplements Using Total X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry and Health Risk Evaluation — Blanca Gladiana Beltrán Piña, Eduardo Santellano‐Estrada, et al. · Foods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS