Monthly Scale Validation of Climate Models’ Outputs Against Gridded Data over South Africa

The validation of climate models is important for ensuring accurate climate variability over a given region. This study evaluates the performance of multiple global climate model simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 5 and 6 and the downscaled regional climate model simulations from the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment against gridded observational data from the Climatic Research Unit gridded data during the historic period 1981–2000. Spatial analysis using monthly bias maps and statistical metrics (i.e., correlation coefficient, standard deviation, and centred root-mean-squared error) were employed to assess the model outputs’ ability to reproduce monthly temperature and precipitation patterns over South Africa. The results indicate an improvement in CMIP6 and CORDEX model simulation outputs compared to their CMIP5 predecessors, with reduced biases and enhanced correlation. The study underscores the importance of model selection for regional climate analysis and highlights a need for further model development to capture complex physical processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16101200
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monthly Scale Validation of Climate Models’ Outputs Against Gridded Data over South Africa

Helga Chauke, Rita Pongrácz
Atmosphere
Climate variability and models
article

Monthly Scale Validation of Climate Models’ Outputs Against Gridded Data over South Africa

Helga Chauke, Rita Pongrácz
article en

Abstract

The validation of climate models is important for ensuring accurate climate variability over a given region. This study evaluates the performance of multiple global climate model simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 5 and 6 and the downscaled regional climate model simulations from the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment against gridded observational data from the Climatic Research Unit gridded data during the historic period 1981–2000. Spatial analysis using monthly bias maps and statistical metrics (i.e., correlation coefficient, standard deviation, and centred root-mean-squared error) were employed to assess the model outputs’ ability to reproduce monthly temperature and precipitation patterns over South Africa. The results indicate an improvement in CMIP6 and CORDEX model simulation outputs compared to their CMIP5 predecessors, with reduced biases and enhanced correlation. The study underscores the importance of model selection for regional climate analysis and highlights a need for further model development to capture complex physical processes.

AtmosphereVol. 16(10)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Institute of Natural Resources (ZA), Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.