Comparison of a novel mini-channel design with other coolant channel designs for liquid cooling type of battery thermal management system: A numerical study

• BTMS with novel mini-channel is compared to three common indirect liquid-cooled BTMS. • BTMS with serpentine channel, wavy channels, jacketed cells, and mini-channel are studied. • Serpentine channel and wavy channels are found unsuitable under given conditions. • Performance of BTMS with jacketed cells and mini-channels are the most appropriate. The thermal management of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in electric vehicles (EVs) is critically dependent on the design of coolant channels. An optimized channel design not only enhances thermal regulation but also contributes to reduced operational costs. While numerous studies have examined individual channel configurations, a systematic comparative analysis of battery thermal management system (BTMS) performance using different coolant channel designs under high C-rate conditions remains limited. To address this gap, the present study performs a comprehensive numerical investigation of BTMS performance using four distinct water-cooled channel designs, referred to as Models 1 through 4. Each configuration accommodates an identical arrangement of twenty LIB cells to maintain consistency across comparisons. Simulation results reveal that all models maintain the maximum temperature (T max ) within the safe operational limit even at a high discharge rate of 5C. However, Model 1 exhibits an excessive temperature difference (ΔT), surpassing the recommended threshold. Further analysis under varying ambient temperatures and Reynolds numbers shows that both Models 1 and 2 experience ΔT and T max values beyond acceptable limits. In terms of energy efficiency, Model 2 demonstrates the highest pump power consumption. Considering both thermal management effectiveness and energy consumption, Model 4 emerges as the most suitable coolant channel design for BTMS applications under harsh conditions, whereas Model 1 is the least favourable. These findings provide valuable insights for the development of more efficient and reliable thermal management strategies for high-performance EV battery systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107768
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of a novel mini-channel design with other coolant channel designs for liquid cooling type of battery thermal management system: A numerical study

Devesh Kumar, Arunkumar Samanta, Tanmay Dutta
4 citations
Results in Engineering
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
2.73
article

Comparison of a novel mini-channel design with other coolant channel designs for liquid cooling type of battery thermal management system: A numerical study

Devesh Kumar, Arunkumar Samanta, Tanmay Dutta
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• BTMS with novel mini-channel is compared to three common indirect liquid-cooled BTMS. • BTMS with serpentine channel, wavy channels, jacketed cells, and mini-channel are studied. • Serpentine channel and wavy channels are found unsuitable under given conditions. • Performance of BTMS with jacketed cells and mini-channels are the most appropriate. The thermal management of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in electric vehicles (EVs) is critically dependent on the design of coolant channels. An optimized channel design not only enhances thermal regulation but also contributes to reduced operational costs. While numerous studies have examined individual channel configurations, a systematic comparative analysis of battery thermal management system (BTMS) performance using different coolant channel designs under high C-rate conditions remains limited. To address this gap, the present study performs a comprehensive numerical investigation of BTMS performance using four distinct water-cooled channel designs, referred to as Models 1 through 4. Each configuration accommodates an identical arrangement of twenty LIB cells to maintain consistency across comparisons. Simulation results reveal that all models maintain the maximum temperature (T max ) within the safe operational limit even at a high discharge rate of 5C. However, Model 1 exhibits an excessive temperature difference (ΔT), surpassing the recommended threshold. Further analysis under varying ambient temperatures and Reynolds numbers shows that both Models 1 and 2 experience ΔT and T max values beyond acceptable limits. In terms of energy efficiency, Model 2 demonstrates the highest pump power consumption. Considering both thermal management effectiveness and energy consumption, Model 4 emerges as the most suitable coolant channel design for BTMS applications under harsh conditions, whereas Model 1 is the least favourable. These findings provide valuable insights for the development of more efficient and reliable thermal management strategies for high-performance EV battery systems.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
2.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.