Scale, Engage, or Both?: Potential and Perils of Applying Large Language Models in Interview and Conversation-Based Research

An increasing number of studies apply tools powered by large language models (LLMs) to interview and conversation-based research, one of the most commonly used research methods in CSCW. This panel invites the CSCW community to critically debate the role of LLMs in reshaping interview-based methods. We aim to explore how these tools might (1) address persistent challenges in conversation-based research, such as limited scalability and participant engagement, (2) introduce novel methodological possibilities, and (3) surface additional practical, technical, and ethical concerns. The panel discussion will be grounded on the panelists’ prior experience applying LLMs to their own interview and conversation-based research.We ask whether LLMs offer unique advantages to enhance interview research, beyond automating certain aspects of the research process. Through this discussion, we encourage researchers to reflect on how applying LLM tools may require rethinking research design, conversational protocols, and ethical practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3715070.3748284
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scale, Engage, or Both?: Potential and Perils of Applying Large Language Models in Interview and Conversation-Based Research

Shivani Kapania, Hope Schroeder, Marianne Aubin Le Quéré, Steven P. Dow et al.
1 citations
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
4.20
article

Scale, Engage, or Both?: Potential and Perils of Applying Large Language Models in Interview and Conversation-Based Research

Shivani Kapania, Hope Schroeder, Marianne Aubin Le Quéré, Steven P. Dow, Eugenia Ha Rim Rho, Alejandro Cuevas, Angel Hsing‐Chi Hwang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

An increasing number of studies apply tools powered by large language models (LLMs) to interview and conversation-based research, one of the most commonly used research methods in CSCW. This panel invites the CSCW community to critically debate the role of LLMs in reshaping interview-based methods. We aim to explore how these tools might (1) address persistent challenges in conversation-based research, such as limited scalability and participant engagement, (2) introduce novel methodological possibilities, and (3) surface additional practical, technical, and ethical concerns. The panel discussion will be grounded on the panelists’ prior experience applying LLMs to their own interview and conversation-based research.We ask whether LLMs offer unique advantages to enhance interview research, beyond automating certain aspects of the research process. Through this discussion, we encourage researchers to reflect on how applying LLM tools may require rethinking research design, conversational protocols, and ethical practices.

University of Southern California (US), Princeton University (US), University of California San Diego (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scale, Engage, or Both?: Potential and Perils of Applying Large Language Models in Interview and Conversation-Based Research — Shivani Kapania, Hope Schroeder, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS