Nanomechanical Properties of Rib Bones in Diabetic vs. Healthy Rat Models

This study examines how diabetes mellitus and physiological aging influence the nanomechanical behavior of rat rib cortical bone using combined static and dynamic nanoindentation. Ribs from young control, old, and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats were analyzed to quantify both intrinsic and frequency-dependent mechanical properties. Static nanoindentation revealed markedly higher hardness and elastic modulus in the diabetic group (0.47 ± 0.22 GPa and 9.53 ± 3.03 GPa, respectively) compared to controls (0.11 ± 0.03 GPa and 3.21 ± 0.51 GPa; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The modulus-to-hardness ratio, an indicator of fracture toughness, was reduced from 30.34 in controls to 20.45 in diabetics, suggesting increased stiffness but greater brittleness. Dynamic nanoindentation (0-4.5 Hz) demonstrated significant aging-related changes in the storage and loss moduli (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while the loss factor (tan δ < 1) and viscosity remained similar across groups, indicating predominantly solid-like behavior. These results show that diabetes stiffens bone tissue through matrix-level alterations, whereas aging primarily affects its viscoelastic damping capacity. The combined static-dynamic nanoindentation protocol provides a robust framework for distinguishing disease- and age-related bone degradation at the tissue scale. Translationally, the findings help explain why bones in diabetic or elderly individuals may fracture despite normal mineral density, underscoring the need to assess bone quality beyond conventional densitometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nanomaterials
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15201582
Primary Topic
Bone health and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nanomechanical Properties of Rib Bones in Diabetic vs. Healthy Rat Models

Gergely H. Fodor, Gábor Gulyás, Tamás Tarjányi, József Tolnai et al.
Nanomaterials
Bone health and treatments
article

Nanomechanical Properties of Rib Bones in Diabetic vs. Healthy Rat Models

Gergely H. Fodor, Gábor Gulyás, Tamás Tarjányi, József Tolnai, Ferenc Peták, Krisztián Bali, Róbert Kiss, Petra Somogyi, Fruzsina Kun-Szabó, Csaba Rosztóczy
article en

Abstract

This study examines how diabetes mellitus and physiological aging influence the nanomechanical behavior of rat rib cortical bone using combined static and dynamic nanoindentation. Ribs from young control, old, and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats were analyzed to quantify both intrinsic and frequency-dependent mechanical properties. Static nanoindentation revealed markedly higher hardness and elastic modulus in the diabetic group (0.47 ± 0.22 GPa and 9.53 ± 3.03 GPa, respectively) compared to controls (0.11 ± 0.03 GPa and 3.21 ± 0.51 GPa; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The modulus-to-hardness ratio, an indicator of fracture toughness, was reduced from 30.34 in controls to 20.45 in diabetics, suggesting increased stiffness but greater brittleness. Dynamic nanoindentation (0-4.5 Hz) demonstrated significant aging-related changes in the storage and loss moduli (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while the loss factor (tan δ < 1) and viscosity remained similar across groups, indicating predominantly solid-like behavior. These results show that diabetes stiffens bone tissue through matrix-level alterations, whereas aging primarily affects its viscoelastic damping capacity. The combined static-dynamic nanoindentation protocol provides a robust framework for distinguishing disease- and age-related bone degradation at the tissue scale. Translationally, the findings help explain why bones in diabetic or elderly individuals may fracture despite normal mineral density, underscoring the need to assess bone quality beyond conventional densitometry.

NanomaterialsVol. 15(20)
University of Szeged (HU), Semilab (Hungary) (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Bone health and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.