Evaluation of a Soviet-Era Gravimetric Survey Using Absolute Gravity Measurements and Global Gravity Models: Toward the First National Geoid of Kazakhstan

Determining a high-precision national geoid is a fundamental step in modernizing Kazakhstan’s vertical reference system. However, the country’s vast territory, complex topography, and limited coverage of modern terrestrial and airborne gravimetric surveys present significant challenges. In this context, Soviet-era gravimetric maps at a 1:200,000 scale remain the only consistent nationwide data source, yet their reliability has not previously been rigorously assessed within modern gravity standards. This study presents the first comprehensive validation of Soviet-era gravimetric surveys using two independent approaches. The first approach is about the comparison of gravity anomalies with the global geopotential models EGM2008, EIGEN-6C4 and XGM2019e_2159. The second approach is about the direct evaluation against absolute gravity measurements from the newly established Qazaqstan Gravity Reference Frame (QazGRF). The analysis demonstrates that, after applying systematic corrections, the Soviet-era gravimetric survey retains high information content. The mean discrepancy with QazGRF measurements is 0.7 mGal with a standard deviation of 2.5 mGal, and more than 90% of the evaluated points deviate by less than ±5 mGal. Larger inconsistencies, up to 20 mGal, are confined to mountainous and geophysically complex regions. In addition, several artifacts inherent to the global models were identified, suggesting that the integration of validated regional gravimetric data can also support future improvements of global gravity models. A key finding was the detection of an artifact in the global models on sheet M43. Its presence was confirmed by comparison with terrestrial gravimetric data and inter-model differences. It was established that the anomaly is caused by inaccuracies in the terrestrial “fill-in” component of the EGM2008 model, which subsequently inherited by later global solutions. The results confirm that Soviet gravimetric maps, once critically re-evaluated and tied to absolute observations, can be effectively integrated with global models. This integration delivers reliable, high-resolution inputs for regional gravity-field modeling. It establishes a robust scientific and practical foundation for constructing the first national geoid of Kazakhstan and for implementing a unified state coordinate and height system. It also helps enhance the accuracy of global geopotential models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15100404
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a Soviet-Era Gravimetric Survey Using Absolute Gravity Measurements and Global Gravity Models: Toward the First National Geoid of Kazakhstan

Daniya Shoganbekova, Asset Urazaliyev, Serik Nurakynov, Roman Sermiagin et al.
2 citations
Geosciences
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
3.59
article

Evaluation of a Soviet-Era Gravimetric Survey Using Absolute Gravity Measurements and Global Gravity Models: Toward the First National Geoid of Kazakhstan

Daniya Shoganbekova, Asset Urazaliyev, Serik Nurakynov, Roman Sermiagin, Magzhan Kozhakhmetov, Anel Islyamova, Nailya Zhaksygul
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Determining a high-precision national geoid is a fundamental step in modernizing Kazakhstan’s vertical reference system. However, the country’s vast territory, complex topography, and limited coverage of modern terrestrial and airborne gravimetric surveys present significant challenges. In this context, Soviet-era gravimetric maps at a 1:200,000 scale remain the only consistent nationwide data source, yet their reliability has not previously been rigorously assessed within modern gravity standards. This study presents the first comprehensive validation of Soviet-era gravimetric surveys using two independent approaches. The first approach is about the comparison of gravity anomalies with the global geopotential models EGM2008, EIGEN-6C4 and XGM2019e_2159. The second approach is about the direct evaluation against absolute gravity measurements from the newly established Qazaqstan Gravity Reference Frame (QazGRF). The analysis demonstrates that, after applying systematic corrections, the Soviet-era gravimetric survey retains high information content. The mean discrepancy with QazGRF measurements is 0.7 mGal with a standard deviation of 2.5 mGal, and more than 90% of the evaluated points deviate by less than ±5 mGal. Larger inconsistencies, up to 20 mGal, are confined to mountainous and geophysically complex regions. In addition, several artifacts inherent to the global models were identified, suggesting that the integration of validated regional gravimetric data can also support future improvements of global gravity models. A key finding was the detection of an artifact in the global models on sheet M43. Its presence was confirmed by comparison with terrestrial gravimetric data and inter-model differences. It was established that the anomaly is caused by inaccuracies in the terrestrial “fill-in” component of the EGM2008 model, which subsequently inherited by later global solutions. The results confirm that Soviet gravimetric maps, once critically re-evaluated and tied to absolute observations, can be effectively integrated with global models. This integration delivers reliable, high-resolution inputs for regional gravity-field modeling. It establishes a robust scientific and practical foundation for constructing the first national geoid of Kazakhstan and for implementing a unified state coordinate and height system. It also helps enhance the accuracy of global geopotential models.

GeosciencesVol. 15(10)
International Finance Corporation (KZ), Satbayev University (KZ), Centre National d'Études Spatiales (FR), International Information Technologies University (KZ), Ionosphere Institute (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
3.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.