Negative Campaigns, Negative Votes? Meanings of Voting and Political Campaigns

Negative campaigns can have different effects on voting behavior and political attitudes. While recent work has differentiated between contexts and campaigns, few have investigated the mechanisms underlying the effects of negative campaigns. We argue that negative campaigning may affect whether citizens understand voting as supporting one candidate or party (positive meanings of voting), as opposing another (negative meanings of voting), or even as something useless, unpleasant or undesirable (anti-voting meanings). Using preregistered cross-sectional analyses in the 2022 Hungarian and US elections, we confirm that negative and anti-voting meanings are pervasive, and related to political parties’ use of negative and “dirty” campaigns. Two preregistered survey experiments, however, only confirm the effects of the most outrageous campaign messages. We conclude that meanings of voting are important democratic attitudes that are related to parties’ campaigning behavior. However, they are relatively stable attitudes that are only affected by relatively extreme stimuli.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Press/Politics
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251376808
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative Campaigns, Negative Votes? Meanings of Voting and Political Campaigns

Ming M. Boyer, Cal Le Gall, Carolina Plescia
The International Journal of Press/Politics
Social Media and Politics
article

Negative Campaigns, Negative Votes? Meanings of Voting and Political Campaigns

Ming M. Boyer, Cal Le Gall, Carolina Plescia
article en

Abstract

Negative campaigns can have different effects on voting behavior and political attitudes. While recent work has differentiated between contexts and campaigns, few have investigated the mechanisms underlying the effects of negative campaigns. We argue that negative campaigning may affect whether citizens understand voting as supporting one candidate or party (positive meanings of voting), as opposing another (negative meanings of voting), or even as something useless, unpleasant or undesirable (anti-voting meanings). Using preregistered cross-sectional analyses in the 2022 Hungarian and US elections, we confirm that negative and anti-voting meanings are pervasive, and related to political parties’ use of negative and “dirty” campaigns. Two preregistered survey experiments, however, only confirm the effects of the most outrageous campaign messages. We conclude that meanings of voting are important democratic attitudes that are related to parties’ campaigning behavior. However, they are relatively stable attitudes that are only affected by relatively extreme stimuli.

The International Journal of Press/Politics
University of Vienna (AT), University of Salzburg (AT), Government of Lower Austria (AT), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Negative Campaigns, Negative Votes? Meanings of Voting and Political Campaigns — Ming M. Boyer, Cal Le Gall, et al. · The International Journal of Press/Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS