Investigating Buoyant Plume Dynamics Induced by Localized Fire‐Simulated Heating Over Plant Canopies Using LES

Abstract Plume interaction with a forest canopy results in flow features distinct from those in grasslands. Here, we model the turbulence dynamics of a buoyant plume in a homogeneous plant canopy with a crosswind using Large‐Eddy Simulations. As the plume interacts with the crosswind, we observe increased vorticity at the windward and tilted hair‐pin‐like vortical structures on the leeward sides. Strong rotational cores, representing counter‐rotating vortex pairs (CVPs), form as the flow twists and spirals into the leeward side of the buoyancy source. Flow patterns aloft exhibit helical motions as the CVPs propagate downstream, trailing the plume. We also simulate a no‐canopy environment for comparison. In the canopy case, the plume tilts less steeply near the source due to the canopy drag and its leeward side is marked by flow recirculation, which obstructs the approaching upstream flow. Moreover, the plume transition to the bent‐over phase is delayed and oscillations in the far‐field mean plume centerline are more damped. The spatial organization of momentum‐flux events also differs between the two environments. Upstream of the plume centerline, there is downward momentum transfer primarily via ejections above and sweeps within the canopy. On the leeward side, counter‐gradient motions (outward interactions) prevail in transferring momentum away from the buoyancy source. Contrarily, in the no‐canopy environment, counter‐gradient motions near the surface are wedged between ejection‐ and sweep‐dominated regions on the upstream and downstream sides, respectively. Insights into plume behavior in canopy versus no‐canopy environments are vital for comparing with experiments and refining fire‐behavior and plume‐rise models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd045722
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Buoyant Plume Dynamics Induced by Localized Fire‐Simulated Heating Over Plant Canopies Using LES

Ajinkya Desai, Tirtha Banerjee, Antonio Quim Cervantes
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
3.33
article

Investigating Buoyant Plume Dynamics Induced by Localized Fire‐Simulated Heating Over Plant Canopies Using LES

Ajinkya Desai, Tirtha Banerjee, Antonio Quim Cervantes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Plume interaction with a forest canopy results in flow features distinct from those in grasslands. Here, we model the turbulence dynamics of a buoyant plume in a homogeneous plant canopy with a crosswind using Large‐Eddy Simulations. As the plume interacts with the crosswind, we observe increased vorticity at the windward and tilted hair‐pin‐like vortical structures on the leeward sides. Strong rotational cores, representing counter‐rotating vortex pairs (CVPs), form as the flow twists and spirals into the leeward side of the buoyancy source. Flow patterns aloft exhibit helical motions as the CVPs propagate downstream, trailing the plume. We also simulate a no‐canopy environment for comparison. In the canopy case, the plume tilts less steeply near the source due to the canopy drag and its leeward side is marked by flow recirculation, which obstructs the approaching upstream flow. Moreover, the plume transition to the bent‐over phase is delayed and oscillations in the far‐field mean plume centerline are more damped. The spatial organization of momentum‐flux events also differs between the two environments. Upstream of the plume centerline, there is downward momentum transfer primarily via ejections above and sweeps within the canopy. On the leeward side, counter‐gradient motions (outward interactions) prevail in transferring momentum away from the buoyancy source. Contrarily, in the no‐canopy environment, counter‐gradient motions near the surface are wedged between ejection‐ and sweep‐dominated regions on the upstream and downstream sides, respectively. Insights into plume behavior in canopy versus no‐canopy environments are vital for comparing with experiments and refining fire‐behavior and plume‐rise models.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(19)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), University of California, Irvine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
3.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating Buoyant Plume Dynamics Induced by Localized Fire‐Simulated Heating Over Plant Canopies Using LES — Ajinkya Desai, Tirtha Banerjee, et al. · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS