Review article: Rethinking preparedness for coastal compound flooding: insights from a systematic review

Abstract. Tackling the growing risks of compound flooding (CF) requires transformative preparedness strategies, particularly in estuarine and coastal regions where the interaction of drivers such as storm surges, rainfall, and river discharge exacerbates impacts. Despite progress, fragmented governance, weak cross-sectoral coordination, and the limited integration of scientific insights hinder effective responses. This systematic review draws on 49 studies to explore how preparedness strategies are evolving to integrate technical, environmental, and social dimensions while evaluating the role of governance and collaboration in enhancing adaptive approaches. Hybrid early warning systems – combining statistical and hydrodynamic models with real-time data – are critical for forecasting accuracy and timely decision-making. Similarly, the balanced implementation of green, blue, and grey infrastructure provides sustainable responses, with nature-based solutions complementing traditional engineering. Our results show that strengthening governance and communication is essential to improving preparedness. Involving communities in land-use planning, building regulations, and communication ensures that measures are both actionable and context specific. Incorporating psychological and behavioural data into preparedness frameworks and models helps to strengthen the link between awareness and behaviours. Enhanced coordination across sectors and levels of government is also vital to addressing the systemic nature of CF risks, moving beyond siloed single-hazard responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3977-2025
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review article: Rethinking preparedness for coastal compound flooding: insights from a systematic review

Manuel del Jesús, Anna Scolobig, Dina Vanessa Gomez Rave
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Review article: Rethinking preparedness for coastal compound flooding: insights from a systematic review

Manuel del Jesús, Anna Scolobig, Dina Vanessa Gomez Rave
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Tackling the growing risks of compound flooding (CF) requires transformative preparedness strategies, particularly in estuarine and coastal regions where the interaction of drivers such as storm surges, rainfall, and river discharge exacerbates impacts. Despite progress, fragmented governance, weak cross-sectoral coordination, and the limited integration of scientific insights hinder effective responses. This systematic review draws on 49 studies to explore how preparedness strategies are evolving to integrate technical, environmental, and social dimensions while evaluating the role of governance and collaboration in enhancing adaptive approaches. Hybrid early warning systems – combining statistical and hydrodynamic models with real-time data – are critical for forecasting accuracy and timely decision-making. Similarly, the balanced implementation of green, blue, and grey infrastructure provides sustainable responses, with nature-based solutions complementing traditional engineering. Our results show that strengthening governance and communication is essential to improving preparedness. Involving communities in land-use planning, building regulations, and communication ensures that measures are both actionable and context specific. Incorporating psychological and behavioural data into preparedness frameworks and models helps to strengthen the link between awareness and behaviours. Enhanced coordination across sectors and levels of government is also vital to addressing the systemic nature of CF risks, moving beyond siloed single-hazard responses.

Natural hazards and earth system sciencesVol. 25(10)
University of Geneva (CH), Instituto de Física de Cantabria (ES)
Université de Genève, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.