An integrative cognitive model for multisensory design: benefits and risks of AI-personalization

In this paper, we examine the interplay between multisensory environments, cognitive performance, and artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled personalization. We propose an integrative cognitive model to better understand how the personalization of the sensory environment influences behavior, emotion, and cognition, drawing upon the Cognitive Capacity Hypothesis, Load Theory, Distraction-Conflict Theory, and the Strength and Vulnerability Integration model. Our integrative model delineates how the characteristics of the individual, the task, and the sensory stimuli interact through arousal modulation. Based on recent conceptual and empirical studies, this model proposes that (1) optimal arousal could improve distractor inhibition and task-focusing, (2) metacognitive misjudgments could lead individuals to select suboptimal sensory environments, and (3) aging alters sensory processing efficiency, necessitating tailored approaches. Within this theoretical proposition, we argue that sensory stimuli modulate arousal and available cognitive capacity, thereby influencing cognitive performance. Thus, when expanding to AI, personalized uni- and multisensory environments could demonstrate both benefits (e.g., enhanced attentional states, therapeutic applications) and risks (e.g., privacy erosion, metacognitive biases). Empirical evidence suggests that preferred background music can reduce mind-wandering, while olfactory stimuli, though underutilized in Western societies, hold untapped potential due to their strong links to memory and emotion. Whereas AI-personalized sensory environments open new perspectives into user experiences and therapeutic approaches (e.g., VR, music therapy, multisensory environment), they raise ethical concerns as the use of algorithms may polarize preferences and exploit behavioral data. Future research should address ethical AI design while leveraging cross-modal correspondences to enhance cognitive, emotional, and behavioral outcomes. Overall, this integrative model proposes an integrative framework by gathering all essential elements for creating a meaningful and coherent multisensory environment, which could be applied to researchers, artists, or marketers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Computer Science
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1652537
Primary Topic
Color perception and design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An integrative cognitive model for multisensory design: benefits and risks of AI-personalization

Xavier Corveleyn, Roxane L. Bartoletti
Frontiers in Computer Science
Color perception and design
article

An integrative cognitive model for multisensory design: benefits and risks of AI-personalization

Xavier Corveleyn, Roxane L. Bartoletti
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the interplay between multisensory environments, cognitive performance, and artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled personalization. We propose an integrative cognitive model to better understand how the personalization of the sensory environment influences behavior, emotion, and cognition, drawing upon the Cognitive Capacity Hypothesis, Load Theory, Distraction-Conflict Theory, and the Strength and Vulnerability Integration model. Our integrative model delineates how the characteristics of the individual, the task, and the sensory stimuli interact through arousal modulation. Based on recent conceptual and empirical studies, this model proposes that (1) optimal arousal could improve distractor inhibition and task-focusing, (2) metacognitive misjudgments could lead individuals to select suboptimal sensory environments, and (3) aging alters sensory processing efficiency, necessitating tailored approaches. Within this theoretical proposition, we argue that sensory stimuli modulate arousal and available cognitive capacity, thereby influencing cognitive performance. Thus, when expanding to AI, personalized uni- and multisensory environments could demonstrate both benefits (e.g., enhanced attentional states, therapeutic applications) and risks (e.g., privacy erosion, metacognitive biases). Empirical evidence suggests that preferred background music can reduce mind-wandering, while olfactory stimuli, though underutilized in Western societies, hold untapped potential due to their strong links to memory and emotion. Whereas AI-personalized sensory environments open new perspectives into user experiences and therapeutic approaches (e.g., VR, music therapy, multisensory environment), they raise ethical concerns as the use of algorithms may polarize preferences and exploit behavioral data. Future research should address ethical AI design while leveraging cross-modal correspondences to enhance cognitive, emotional, and behavioral outcomes. Overall, this integrative model proposes an integrative framework by gathering all essential elements for creating a meaningful and coherent multisensory environment, which could be applied to researchers, artists, or marketers.

Frontiers in Computer ScienceVol. 7
Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Laboratoire d'Anthropologie et de Psychologie Cognitives et Sociales (FR), Nîmes Université (FR), Université de Nîmes (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Color perception and design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.