Heterogeneity in health insurance choice: An experimental investigation of consumer choice and feature preferences

Abstract We investigate heterogeneity in health insurance choice using data from a controlled laboratory experiment. Participants make consecutive choices from sets of insurance plans that vary in premium, deductible, and complementary coverage of illnesses. We find that there is considerable heterogeneity in how much individuals are willing to pay for certain plan attributes. To better understand these differences, we account for individual risk preferences using a rank‐dependent expected utility (RDEU) model and assess the welfare effects of plan choices. At the aggregate level, we find welfare losses under both the normative RDEU model and the descriptive EV model. At the individual level, however, the results are more differentiated: for some individuals, choices are consistent with their RDEU preferences, whereas for others, choices do not fit either model, suggesting either decision errors or reliance on heuristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk & Insurance
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70026
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneity in health insurance choice: An experimental investigation of consumer choice and feature preferences

Markus Vomhof, Nadja Kairies‐Schwarz, Johanna Kokot, Benedicta Hermanns
Journal of Risk & Insurance
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Heterogeneity in health insurance choice: An experimental investigation of consumer choice and feature preferences

Markus Vomhof, Nadja Kairies‐Schwarz, Johanna Kokot, Benedicta Hermanns
article en

Abstract

Abstract We investigate heterogeneity in health insurance choice using data from a controlled laboratory experiment. Participants make consecutive choices from sets of insurance plans that vary in premium, deductible, and complementary coverage of illnesses. We find that there is considerable heterogeneity in how much individuals are willing to pay for certain plan attributes. To better understand these differences, we account for individual risk preferences using a rank‐dependent expected utility (RDEU) model and assess the welfare effects of plan choices. At the aggregate level, we find welfare losses under both the normative RDEU model and the descriptive EV model. At the individual level, however, the results are more differentiated: for some individuals, choices are consistent with their RDEU preferences, whereas for others, choices do not fit either model, suggesting either decision errors or reliance on heuristics.

Journal of Risk & InsuranceVol. 92(4)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Hamburg Institut (Germany) (DE), Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Heterogeneity in health insurance choice: An experimental investigation of consumer choice and feature preferences — Markus Vomhof, Nadja Kairies‐Schwarz, et al. · Journal of Risk & Insurance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS